Skip to content
etf.net

QBQV vs QTJA

AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

QBQVBCboe

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTJACCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QBQV −0.05pt a year

QBQV0.74%QTJA0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

QBQV 2.3×the volume

QBQV21.6KQTJA9.56K

QBQV vs QTJA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

0.0%QBQV+3.6%QTJA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QBQV 0.0%. QTJA +3.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1%2%5%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QBQV 0.74%, better
QTJA 0.79%
Fund size
QBQV $53M
QTJA $26M
1Y total return
QBQV No data
QTJA +15.6%
Holdings
QBQV 3
QTJA 3
Avg volume (30D)
QBQV 21.6K sh, better
QTJA 9.56K sh
NAV per share
QBQV $26.64
QTJA $33.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBQV: Cost 81, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 99, Durability 48. QTJA: Cost 46, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBQV, QTJA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBQVQTJA
Cost30% weightA81HigherC46
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB59HigherC53
Tradability15% weightB64HigherB56
Holdings10% weightA99Not scored
Durability5% weightC48B60Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBQV and QTJA are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Accelerated⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

QBQV ranks 1st and QTJA 3rd of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQVAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BQTAPInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 3CQTJAInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 4CQTOCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - OctoberScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QBQVBAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

QTJACInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

In short

QBQV No data

QTJA Triple the upside of the Invesco QQQ Trust up to a cap, with losses passed through roughly one-for-one, measured over a one-year period that resets each January. Innovator runs the same playbook on four start months; this one holds the January seat.

Stated mandate

QBQV No data

QTJA The Fund seeks triple the upside return of QQQ, subject to a cap, while approximately matching QQQ's losses over the annual outcome period.

Why people hold it

QBQV No data

  • QTJA Leans into risk instead of away from it: aims for 3x the reference fund's upside to a cap over the annual period, with the trade-off spelled out in the objective.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% expense ratio, dead on the median for Innovator's accelerated lineup, so choosing the January start costs no more than the other months.
  • The same structure runs on four start months (QTJA, QTAP, QTJL, QTOC), so entry points can be staggered rather than hinging on one January cap.

Worth knowing

QBQV No data

  • QTJA No buffer. Losses approximately match the reference fund's, so the acceleration only works in one direction.
  • The tripled-upside-and-cap math is measured over the full annual outcome period; coming in mid-period means different exposure than a fresh start.
  • Small and thinly traded, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than mainstream index funds.

Full QBQV profile⁠

Full QTJA profile⁠

QBQV vs QTJA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBQV vs QTJA Cost

Overpaying QTJA vs QBQV

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBQV 0.74%

    $14,307

  • QTJA 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBQV 0.74%
  • QTJA 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QTJA $15,174QBQV $14,307

Year by year

YearQBQVQTJAOverpaying
10$1,319$1,405$86
20$5,015$5,331$316
30$14,307$15,174$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBQV, cheaper
  • 0.79%QTJA
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQV 2nd cheapest of 8 funds

QTJA 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

QBQV vs QTJA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QBQV None
QTJA None

Distribution history

QBQVAll QBQV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTJAAll QTJA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQV vs QTJA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QBQV No dataQTJA 11.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QBQV No dataQTJA 1.12
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QBQV No dataQTJA −35.4%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBQV 0.53QTJA 0.66

Popular comparisons

  • QBQVBvsQTAPB

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTJACvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTOCC

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTJACvsQTOCC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTJLC

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTJACvsQTJLC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.