Skip to content

QTJA vs QTJL

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTJACCboe

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTJLCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

QTJA0.79%QTJL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

QTJA 1.5×the volume

QTJA9.56KQTJL6.4K

3Y return · a year

QTJL +1.3pt

QTJA+17.5%QTJL+18.8%

QTJA vs QTJL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+15.6%QTJA+5.2%QTJL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. QTJA +15.6%. QTJL +5.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QTJA 0.79%
QTJL 0.79%
Fund size
QTJA $26M
QTJL $26M
1Y total return
QTJA +15.6%, better
QTJL +5.2%
Holdings
QTJA 3
QTJL 3
Avg volume (30D)
QTJA 9.56K sh, better
QTJL 6.4K sh
NAV per share
QTJA $33.83
QTJL $40.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QTJA: Cost 46, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings not scored, Durability 60. QTJL: Cost 46, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for QTJA, QTJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQTJAQTJL
Cost30% weightC46C46
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherC40
Tradability15% weightB56B58Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB60B67Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QTJA and QTJL are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Accelerated⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

QTJA ranks 3rd and QTJL 5th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQVAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BQTAPInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 3CQTJAInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 4CQTOCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - OctoberScore 50
  5. Rank 5CQTJLInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 6CXDQQInnovator Growth Accelerated ETF - QuarterlyScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QTJACInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTJLCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

In short

QTJA Triple the upside of the Invesco QQQ Trust up to a cap, with losses passed through roughly one-for-one, measured over a one-year period that resets each January. Innovator runs the same playbook on four start months; this one holds the January seat.

QTJL Leverage without the buffer. QTJL aims for three times QQQ's upside over a roughly one-year outcome period, up to a cap, while declines pass through about one-for-one. It's the July-dated member of Innovator's accelerated lineup.

Stated mandate

QTJA The Fund seeks triple the upside return of QQQ, subject to a cap, while approximately matching QQQ's losses over the annual outcome period.

QTJL The ETF seeks to deliver three times QQQ’s upside over an approximately one-year outcome period, subject to a cap, while retaining roughly one-for-one downside exposure. It can reset for successive periods and may be held indefinitely.

Why people hold it

  • QTJA Leans into risk instead of away from it: aims for 3x the reference fund's upside to a cap over the annual period, with the trade-off spelled out in the objective.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% expense ratio, dead on the median for Innovator's accelerated lineup, so choosing the January start costs no more than the other months.
  • The same structure runs on four start months (QTJA, QTAP, QTJL, QTOC), so entry points can be staggered rather than hinging on one January cap.
  • QTJL Triple upside without the daily reset: the 3x applies to QQQ's move across the full outcome period, not compounded day by day the way daily leveraged funds work.innovatoretfs.com
  • The leverage is packaged as options inside a standard 1940 Act fund, so there's no margin account to maintain and no financing call to manage.innovatoretfs.com
  • Built to roll: when the outcome period ends, a fresh cap is struck and the fund continues, so it can be held across successive periods rather than maturing.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, it prices in line with the rest of Innovator's accelerated funds, so the decision is about structure and start month, not the fee.

Worth knowing

  • QTJA No buffer. Losses approximately match the reference fund's, so the acceleration only works in one direction.
  • The tripled-upside-and-cap math is measured over the full annual outcome period; coming in mid-period means different exposure than a fresh start.
  • Small and thinly traded, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than mainstream index funds.
  • QTJL The acceleration runs one way. QQQ's declines come through roughly one-for-one with no buffer underneath, so the tripled upside is paid for with full downside.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cap and multiple are struck for a whole period: buying partway through changes the payoff you get, and the next period's cap isn't knowable in advance.innovatoretfs.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can run wider than mainstream index ETFs, and it hasn't been a source of income distributions.

Full QTJA profile⁠

Full QTJL profile⁠

QTJA vs QTJL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QTJA vs QTJL Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QTJA 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QTJL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QTJA 0.79%
  • QTJL 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QTJA $15,174QTJL $15,174

Year by year

YearQTJAQTJL
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%QTJA
  • 0.79%QTJL
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTJA 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

QTJL 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

QTJA vs QTJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QTJA None
QTJL None

Distribution history

QTJAAll QTJA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTJLAll QTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTJA vs QTJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QTJA 11.1%, betterQTJL 12.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QTJA 1.12, betterQTJL 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QTJA −35.4%since Jan 2022QTJL −33.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QTJA 0.66QTJL 0.79

Popular comparisons

  • QTJACvsQBQVB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJLCvsQBQVB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJACvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJLCvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJACvsQTOCC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJLCvsQTOCC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.