QTJA ranks 3rd and QTJL 5th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.
QTJA vs QTJL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
QTJA 1.5×the volume
9.56K6.4K
QTJL +1.3pt
+17.5%+18.8%
QTJA vs QTJL Performance
+15.6%+5.2%
- QTJA 0.79%
- QTJL 0.79%
- QTJA $26M
- QTJL $26M
- QTJA +15.6%, better
- QTJL +5.2%
- QTJA 3
- QTJL 3
- QTJA 9.56K sh, better
- QTJL 6.4K sh
- QTJA $33.83
- QTJL $40.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QTJA | QTJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | C46 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B56 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B60 | B67Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
Same Category. QTJA and QTJL are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QTJAC
QTJLC
In short
QTJA Triple the upside of the Invesco QQQ Trust up to a cap, with losses passed through roughly one-for-one, measured over a one-year period that resets each January. Innovator runs the same playbook on four start months; this one holds the January seat.
QTJL Leverage without the buffer. QTJL aims for three times QQQ's upside over a roughly one-year outcome period, up to a cap, while declines pass through about one-for-one. It's the July-dated member of Innovator's accelerated lineup.
Stated mandate
QTJA The Fund seeks triple the upside return of QQQ, subject to a cap, while approximately matching QQQ's losses over the annual outcome period.
QTJL The ETF seeks to deliver three times QQQ’s upside over an approximately one-year outcome period, subject to a cap, while retaining roughly one-for-one downside exposure. It can reset for successive periods and may be held indefinitely.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QTJA vs QTJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QTJA vs QTJL Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QTJA 0.79%
$15,174
QTJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QTJA | QTJL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%QTJA
- 0.79%QTJL
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
QTJA 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QTJL 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QTJA vs QTJL Dividends
- QTJA None
- QTJL None
Distribution history
QTJA vs QTJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QTJA 11.1%, betterQTJL 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QTJA 1.12, betterQTJL 1.08
- Worst fall
- QTJA −35.4%QTJL −33.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QTJA 0.66QTJL 0.79
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.