Skip to content
etf.net

QBQV vs QTJL

AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

QBQVBCboe

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTJLCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QBQV −0.05pt a year

QBQV0.74%QTJL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

QBQV 3.4×the volume

QBQV21.6KQTJL6.4K

QBQV vs QTJL Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

0.0%QBQV+1.2%QTJL

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QBQV 0.0%. QTJL +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.4%6%8%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QBQV 0.74%, better
QTJL 0.79%
Fund size
QBQV $53M
QTJL $26M
1Y total return
QBQV No data
QTJL +5.2%
Holdings
QBQV 3
QTJL 3
Avg volume (30D)
QBQV 21.6K sh, better
QTJL 6.4K sh
NAV per share
QBQV $26.64
QTJL $40.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBQV: Cost 81, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 99, Durability 48. QTJL: Cost 46, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBQV, QTJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBQVQTJL
Cost30% weightA81HigherC46
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB59HigherC40
Tradability15% weightB64HigherB58
Holdings10% weightA99Not scored
Durability5% weightC48B67Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBQV and QTJL are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Accelerated⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

QBQV ranks 1st and QTJL 5th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQVAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BQTAPInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 4CQTOCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - OctoberScore 50
  4. Rank 5CQTJLInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 6CXDQQInnovator Growth Accelerated ETF - QuarterlyScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QBQVBAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

QTJLCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

In short

QBQV No data

QTJL Leverage without the buffer. QTJL aims for three times QQQ's upside over a roughly one-year outcome period, up to a cap, while declines pass through about one-for-one. It's the July-dated member of Innovator's accelerated lineup.

Stated mandate

QBQV No data

QTJL The ETF seeks to deliver three times QQQ’s upside over an approximately one-year outcome period, subject to a cap, while retaining roughly one-for-one downside exposure. It can reset for successive periods and may be held indefinitely.

Why people hold it

QBQV No data

  • QTJL Triple upside without the daily reset: the 3x applies to QQQ's move across the full outcome period, not compounded day by day the way daily leveraged funds work.innovatoretfs.com
  • The leverage is packaged as options inside a standard 1940 Act fund, so there's no margin account to maintain and no financing call to manage.innovatoretfs.com
  • Built to roll: when the outcome period ends, a fresh cap is struck and the fund continues, so it can be held across successive periods rather than maturing.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, it prices in line with the rest of Innovator's accelerated funds, so the decision is about structure and start month, not the fee.

Worth knowing

QBQV No data

  • QTJL The acceleration runs one way. QQQ's declines come through roughly one-for-one with no buffer underneath, so the tripled upside is paid for with full downside.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cap and multiple are struck for a whole period: buying partway through changes the payoff you get, and the next period's cap isn't knowable in advance.innovatoretfs.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can run wider than mainstream index ETFs, and it hasn't been a source of income distributions.

Full QBQV profile⁠

Full QTJL profile⁠

QBQV vs QTJL Holdings

How QBQV and QTJL differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QBQV and 0.0% of QTJL.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors97.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in QBQV and QTJL, widest gap first
SectorMore in QBQVMore in QTJL
CommunicationQTJL +1.3 points
TechnologyQTJL +1.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQBQV +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesQBQV +0.6 points
Health CareQBQV +0.6 points
IndustrialsQBQV +0.2 points
MaterialsQBQV +0.1 points
UtilitiesQBQV +0.1 points
EnergySame weight
FinancialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QBQV and QTJL, widest gap first
CountryMore in QBQVMore in QTJL
United StatesSame weight
CanadaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
BrazilSame weight
ChinaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QBQV102.8%
  • QTJL107.5%

Securities held

  • QBQV2
  • QTJL3

Asset class

QBQV
Equity
QTJL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QBQV2
  • In both0
  • Only in QTJL3

Only in QBQV

2 securities, 100% of QBQV by weight

  • Qqq 12/31/2026 5.47 C97.48%
  • Qqq 12/31/2026 739.84 P4.74%

Only in QTJL

3 securities, 100% of QTJL by weight

  • Qqq 06/30/2027 7.38 C96.36%
  • Qqq 06/30/2027 736.4 C10.82%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.30%

Weight gaps

QBQV and QTJL share no securities.

All 5 QBQV holdings⁠All 5 QTJL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBQV vs QTJL Cost

Overpaying QTJL vs QBQV

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBQV 0.74%

    $14,307

  • QTJL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBQV 0.74%
  • QTJL 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QTJL $15,174QBQV $14,307

Year by year

YearQBQVQTJLOverpaying
10$1,319$1,405$86
20$5,015$5,331$316
30$14,307$15,174$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBQV, cheaper
  • 0.79%QTJL
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQV 2nd cheapest of 8 funds

QTJL 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

QBQV vs QTJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QBQV None
QTJL None

Distribution history

QBQVAll QBQV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTJLAll QTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQV vs QTJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QBQV No dataQTJL 12.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QBQV No dataQTJL 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QBQV No dataQTJL −33.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBQV 0.53QTJL 0.79

Popular comparisons

  • QBQVBvsQTAPB

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTJLCvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTJAC

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTJLCvsQTJAC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTOCC

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTJLCvsQTOCC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.