QBQV ranks 1st and QTOC 4th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.
QBQV vs QTOC
QBQV −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.79%
QBQV 2.1×the volume
21.6K10.2K
QBQV vs QTOC Performance
0.0%−2.0%
- QBQV 0.74%, better
- QTOC 0.79%
- QBQV $53M
- QTOC $16M
- QBQV
- QTOC +9.4%
- QBQV 3
- QTOC 3
- QBQV 21.6K sh, better
- QTOC 10.2K sh
- QBQV $26.64
- QTOC $37.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QBQV | QTOC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | C46 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B59Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | B64 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | A99 | |
| Durability | C48 | B57Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
Same Category. QBQV and QTOC are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QBQVB
QTOCC
In short
QTOC Triple the upside, single the downside. QTOC uses options to seek 3x the Nasdaq-100's move up to a cap over a one-year period that resets each October, while carrying full exposure to declines. Accelerator, not airbag.
Stated mandate
QTOC The Fund seeks to deliver three times QQQ's upside return up to a cap, while retaining approximately one-times downside exposure over a one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QBQV vs QTOC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QBQV vs QTOC Cost
Overpaying QTOC vs QBQV
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QBQV 0.74%
$14,307
QTOC 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QBQV | QTOC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,405 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $5,331 | $316 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $15,174 | $867 |
- 0.74%QBQV, cheaper
- 0.79%QTOC
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
QBQV 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
QTOC 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QBQV vs QTOC Dividends
- QBQV None
- QTOC None
Distribution history
QBQV vs QTOC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QBQV QTOC 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QBQV QTOC 1.12
- Worst fall
- QBQV QTOC −33.3%
- Market sensitivity
- QBQV 0.53QTOC 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.