QTJA ranks 3rd and QTOC 4th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.
QTJA vs QTOC
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
QTOC 1.1×the volume
9.56K10.2K
QTOC +0.3pt
+17.5%+17.8%
QTJA vs QTOC Performance
+15.6%+9.4%
- QTJA 0.79%
- QTOC 0.79%
- QTJA $26M
- QTOC $16M
- QTJA +15.6%, better
- QTOC +9.4%
- QTJA 3
- QTOC 3
- QTJA 9.56K sh
- QTOC 10.2K sh, better
- QTJA $33.83
- QTOC $37.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QTJA | QTOC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | C46 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | B56 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B60Higher | B57 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
Same Category. QTJA and QTOC are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QTJAC
QTOCC
In short
QTJA Triple the upside of the Invesco QQQ Trust up to a cap, with losses passed through roughly one-for-one, measured over a one-year period that resets each January. Innovator runs the same playbook on four start months; this one holds the January seat.
QTOC Triple the upside, single the downside. QTOC uses options to seek 3x the Nasdaq-100's move up to a cap over a one-year period that resets each October, while carrying full exposure to declines. Accelerator, not airbag.
Stated mandate
QTJA The Fund seeks triple the upside return of QQQ, subject to a cap, while approximately matching QQQ's losses over the annual outcome period.
QTOC The Fund seeks to deliver three times QQQ's upside return up to a cap, while retaining approximately one-times downside exposure over a one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QTJA vs QTOC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QTJA vs QTOC Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QTJA 0.79%
$15,174
QTOC 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QTJA | QTOC |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%QTJA
- 0.79%QTOC
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
QTJA 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QTOC 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QTJA vs QTOC Dividends
- QTJA None
- QTOC None
Distribution history
QTJA vs QTOC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QTJA 11.1%, betterQTOC 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QTJA 1.12QTOC 1.12Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- QTJA −35.4%QTOC −33.3%
- Market sensitivity
- QTJA 0.66QTOC 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.