Skip to content

QTJA vs QTOC

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTJACCboe

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

QTOCCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

QTJA0.79%QTOC0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

QTOC 1.1×the volume

QTJA9.56KQTOC10.2K

3Y return · a year

QTOC +0.3pt

QTJA+17.5%QTOC+17.8%

QTJA vs QTOC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+15.6%QTJA+9.4%QTOC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. QTJA +15.6%. QTOC +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QTJA 0.79%
QTOC 0.79%
Fund size
QTJA $26M
QTOC $16M
1Y total return
QTJA +15.6%, better
QTOC +9.4%
Holdings
QTJA 3
QTOC 3
Avg volume (30D)
QTJA 9.56K sh
QTOC 10.2K sh, better
NAV per share
QTJA $33.83
QTOC $37.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QTJA: Cost 46, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings not scored, Durability 60. QTOC: Cost 46, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for QTJA, QTOC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQTJAQTOC
Cost30% weightC46C46
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB56B68Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB60HigherB57

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QTJA and QTOC are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Accelerated⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

QTJA ranks 3rd and QTOC 4th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQVAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BQTAPInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 3CQTJAInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 4CQTOCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - OctoberScore 50
  5. Rank 5CQTJLInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QTJACInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

QTOCCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

In short

QTJA Triple the upside of the Invesco QQQ Trust up to a cap, with losses passed through roughly one-for-one, measured over a one-year period that resets each January. Innovator runs the same playbook on four start months; this one holds the January seat.

QTOC Triple the upside, single the downside. QTOC uses options to seek 3x the Nasdaq-100's move up to a cap over a one-year period that resets each October, while carrying full exposure to declines. Accelerator, not airbag.

Stated mandate

QTJA The Fund seeks triple the upside return of QQQ, subject to a cap, while approximately matching QQQ's losses over the annual outcome period.

QTOC The Fund seeks to deliver three times QQQ's upside return up to a cap, while retaining approximately one-times downside exposure over a one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • QTJA Leans into risk instead of away from it: aims for 3x the reference fund's upside to a cap over the annual period, with the trade-off spelled out in the objective.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% expense ratio, dead on the median for Innovator's accelerated lineup, so choosing the January start costs no more than the other months.
  • The same structure runs on four start months (QTJA, QTAP, QTJL, QTOC), so entry points can be staggered rather than hinging on one January cap.
  • QTOC The 3x acceleration is measured across a full one-year outcome period, not reset daily, so there is no day-to-day compounding drift to babysit.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference asset is plain vanilla: the Nasdaq-100 via QQQ. No stock picking, no sector tilt, just an options wrapper bolted onto a widely held index.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, it prices identically to Innovator's other accelerated QQQ funds (QTAP, QTJL, QTJA). The October start month is the differentiator, not the fee.

Worth knowing

  • QTJA No buffer. Losses approximately match the reference fund's, so the acceleration only works in one direction.
  • The tripled-upside-and-cap math is measured over the full annual outcome period; coming in mid-period means different exposure than a fresh start.
  • Small and thinly traded, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than mainstream index funds.
  • QTOC No buffer. The 3x runs one way: up to a cap on gains, while losses pass through at roughly one-for-one with the index.innovatoretfs.com
  • The stated terms belong to holders who own it from one October reset to the next. Enter mid-period and your effective cap and exposure differ from the headline.innovatoretfs.com
  • Small asset base and light trading, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on mainstream index ETFs.

Full QTJA profile⁠

Full QTOC profile⁠

QTJA vs QTOC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QTJA vs QTOC Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QTJA 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QTOC 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QTJA 0.79%
  • QTOC 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QTJA $15,174QTOC $15,174

Year by year

YearQTJAQTOC
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%QTJA
  • 0.79%QTOC
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTJA 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

QTOC 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

QTJA vs QTOC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QTJA None
QTOC None

Distribution history

QTJAAll QTJA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTOCAll QTOC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTJA vs QTOC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QTJA 11.1%, betterQTOC 11.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QTJA 1.12QTOC 1.12Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QTJA −35.4%since Jan 2022QTOC −33.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QTJA 0.66QTOC 0.76

Popular comparisons

  • QTJACvsQBQVB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTOCCvsQBQVB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October · AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJACvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTOCCvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTJACvsQTJLC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTOCCvsQTJLC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.