SKHZ ranks 27th and QBTZ 34th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
QBTZ vs SKHZ
SKHZ −1.56pt a year
2.31%0.75%
SKHZ 4.5×the volume
425K1.9M
QBTZ vs SKHZ Performance
+66.5%−11.2%
- QBTZ 2.31%
- SKHZ 0.75%, better
- QBTZ $3M
- SKHZ $7M
- QBTZ −88.9%
- SKHZ
- QBTZ 3
- SKHZ 2
- QBTZ 425K sh
- SKHZ 1.9M sh, better
- QBTZ $29.06
- SKHZ $12.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QBTZ | SKHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A99 | |
| Risk | D29 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D36Higher | D27 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. QBTZ and SKHZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QBTZD
SKHZC
In short
QBTZ The first 2X short ETF on D-Wave Quantum. QBTZ aims to deliver -200% of QBTS's move for one trading day at a time, then resets, so it is a trading tool rather than a long-haul quantum bet.
Stated mandate
QBTZ QBTZ seeks daily inverse results equal to -200% of the daily percentage change in D-Wave Quantum Inc.'s share price. It is designed for short-term use and does not target results over periods longer than one trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QBTZ vs SKHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QBTZ vs SKHZ Cost
Overpaying QBTZ vs SKHZ
$22,090
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QBTZ 2.31%
$36,572
SKHZ 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QBTZ | SKHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,857 | $1,336 | $2,521 |
| 20 | $13,687 | $5,078 | $8,609 |
| 30 | $36,572 | $14,482 | $22,090 |
- 2.31%QBTZ
- 0.75%SKHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
SKHZ cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ 43rd cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ vs SKHZ Dividends
- QBTZ None
- SKHZ None
Distribution history
QBTZ vs SKHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QBTZ 204.4%SKHZ
- Return per unit of risk
- QBTZ 0.36SKHZ
- Worst fall
- QBTZ −96.6%SKHZ
- Market sensitivity
- QBTZ −8.19SKHZ −6.28
Popular comparisons
- 2.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.