TSLS ranks 3rd and QBTZ 34th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
QBTZ vs TSLS
TSLS −1.36pt a year
2.31%0.95%
QBTZ 1.4×the volume
425K304K
QBTZ vs TSLS Performance
−88.9%−0.7%
- QBTZ 2.31%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- QBTZ $3M
- TSLS $44M
- QBTZ −88.9%
- TSLS −0.7%, better
- QBTZ
- TSLS 2.99%
- QBTZ 3
- TSLS 4
- QBTZ 425K sh, better
- TSLS 304K sh
- QBTZ $29.06
- TSLS $55.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QBTZ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A87 |
| Risk | D29 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D36 | A81Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. QBTZ and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QBTZD
TSLSA
In short
QBTZ The first 2X short ETF on D-Wave Quantum. QBTZ aims to deliver -200% of QBTS's move for one trading day at a time, then resets, so it is a trading tool rather than a long-haul quantum bet.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
QBTZ QBTZ seeks daily inverse results equal to -200% of the daily percentage change in D-Wave Quantum Inc.'s share price. It is designed for short-term use and does not target results over periods longer than one trading day.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QBTZ vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QBTZ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying QBTZ vs TSLS
$18,703
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QBTZ 2.31%
$36,572
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QBTZ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,857 | $1,678 | $2,179 |
| 20 | $13,687 | $6,322 | $7,365 |
| 30 | $36,572 | $17,869 | $18,703 |
- 2.31%QBTZ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ 43rd cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ vs TSLS Dividends
- QBTZ
- TSLS 2.99%
- QBTZ None
- TSLS $1.57
- QBTZ
- TSLS $0.40
- QBTZ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- QBTZ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- QBTZ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
QBTZ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QBTZ 204.4%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- QBTZ 0.36TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- QBTZ −96.6%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QBTZ −8.19TSLS −1.37
Popular comparisons
- 2.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.