QYLD ranks 2nd and QDTE 23rd of 30 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.
QDTE vs QYLD
QYLD −0.36pt a year
0.96%0.60%
QYLD 9.1×the volume
506K4.59M
QDTE vs QYLD Performance
+12.5%+14.8%
- QDTE 0.96%
- QYLD 0.60%, better
- QDTE $834M
- QYLD $7.84B
- QDTE +12.5%
- QYLD +14.8%, better
- QDTE 46.51%, better
- QYLD 12.11%
- QDTE 5
- QYLD 103
- QDTE 506K sh
- QYLD 4.59M sh, better
- QDTE $25.73
- QYLD $17.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QDTE | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D27 | B65Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C46 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A91Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
Same Category. QDTE and QYLD are both graded against the same 30 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QDTEC
QYLDA
In short
QDTE The original 0DTE income ETF: QDTE sells same-day Nasdaq-100 calls every morning and hands the premium to shareholders weekly. Cash on a fast clock, with each session's upside capped in exchange.
QYLD Running since 2013, QYLD is the no-frills version of the Nasdaq-100 income trade: own the index, sell calls against it, pay out monthly. No stock picking, no manager discretion, just a rules-based buy-write index followed closely.
Stated mandate
QDTE The Fund primarily seeks current income and secondarily seeks capital appreciation through a synthetic covered-call strategy that combines long exposure to the Innovation-100 Index with recurring 0DTE call sales.
QYLD QYLD seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the Cboe NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 Index. It uses a buy-write strategy that holds NASDAQ-100 stocks and sells corresponding call options.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QDTE vs QYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QDTE vs QYLD Cost
Overpaying QDTE vs QYLD
$6,217
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QDTE 0.96%
$18,034
QYLD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QDTE | QYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,076 | $619 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $4,116 | $2,267 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $11,817 | $6,217 |
- 0.96%QDTE
- 0.60%QYLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
- Median 0.71%
QYLD 10th cheapest of 30 funds
QDTE 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
QDTE vs QYLD Dividends
- QDTE 46.51%, better
- QYLD 12.11%
- QDTE $12.28
- QYLD $2.14
- QDTE $0.16
- QYLD $0.18
- QDTE Nov 5, 2026
- QYLD Oct 19, 2026
- QDTE Nov 6, 2026
- QYLD Oct 22, 2026
- QDTE Weekly
- QYLD Monthly
Distribution history
QDTE vs QYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QDTE 16.6%QYLD 8.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- QDTE 0.83QYLD 1.31
- Worst fall
- QDTE −22.7%QYLD −24.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QDTE 1.27QYLD 0.48
QDTE and QYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

