QYLD ranks 2nd and QGRD 22nd of 30 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.
QGRD vs QYLD
QYLD −0.25pt a year
0.85%0.60%
QYLD 119.9×the volume
38.3K4.59M
QGRD vs QYLD Performance
+4.3%+14.8%
- QGRD 0.85%
- QYLD 0.60%, better
- QGRD $162M
- QYLD $7.84B
- QGRD +4.3%
- QYLD +14.8%, better
- QGRD
- QYLD 12.11%
- QGRD 7
- QYLD 103
- QGRD 38.3K sh
- QYLD 4.59M sh, better
- QGRD $27.50
- QYLD $17.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QGRD | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | B65Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B56 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | |
| Durability | D35 | A91Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
Same Category. QGRD and QYLD are both graded against the same 30 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QGRDD
QYLDA
In short
QGRD Most Nasdaq-100 options funds are built around selling calls. QGRD runs an actively managed collar on FLEX options tied to the same index, spending some upside to fund an explicit downside cushion.
QYLD Running since 2013, QYLD is the no-frills version of the Nasdaq-100 income trade: own the index, sell calls against it, pay out monthly. No stock picking, no manager discretion, just a rules-based buy-write index followed closely.
Stated mandate
QGRD The fund seeks capital appreciation and capital preservation. It primarily uses FLEX options tied to the Nasdaq-100 and actively managed collars to pursue exposure while generating income, managing volatility, and reducing downside risk.
QYLD QYLD seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the Cboe NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 Index. It uses a buy-write strategy that holds NASDAQ-100 stocks and sells corresponding call options.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QGRD vs QYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QGRD vs QYLD Cost
Overpaying QGRD vs QYLD
$4,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QGRD 0.85%
$16,199
QYLD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QGRD | QYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,076 | $432 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,116 | $1,590 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $11,817 | $4,382 |
- 0.85%QGRD
- 0.60%QYLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
- Median 0.71%
QYLD 10th cheapest of 30 funds
QGRD 20th cheapest of 30 funds
QGRD vs QYLD Dividends
- QGRD
- QYLD 12.11%
- QGRD
- QYLD $2.14
- QGRD $0.42
- QYLD $0.18
- QGRD Dec 24, 2025
- QYLD Oct 19, 2026
- QGRD Dec 26, 2025
- QYLD Oct 22, 2026
- QGRD Irregular
- QYLD Monthly
Distribution history
QGRD vs QYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QGRD 16.2%QYLD 8.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- QGRD 0.47QYLD 1.31
- Worst fall
- QGRD −11.0%QYLD −24.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QGRD 0.94QYLD 0.48
QGRD and QYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

