Skip to content
etf.net

QLD vs RAM

ProShares Ultra QQQ

QLDANYSE Arca

Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF

RAMDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLD −0.61pt a year

QLD0.89%RAM1.50%

Avg volume · 30D

RAM 3.3×the volume

QLD4.15MRAM13.5M

QLD vs RAM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.3%QLD−21.6%RAM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QLD −1.3%. RAM −21.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QLD 0.89%, better
RAM 1.50%
Fund size
QLD $13.3B
RAM $378M
1Y total return
QLD +10.7%
RAM No data
Yield (12M)
QLD 0.15%
RAM No data
Holdings
QLD 113
RAM 1
Avg volume (30D)
QLD 4.15M sh
RAM 13.5M sh, better
NAV per share
QLD $82.56
RAM $8.19
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QLD: Cost 72, Risk 66, Mission 95, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 81. RAM: Cost 6, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for QLD, RAM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQLDRAM
Cost30% weightA72HigherF6
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherF14
Tradability15% weightA100HigherA78
Holdings10% weightA72Not scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherC51

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QLD and RAM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

QLD ranks 1st and RAM 88th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 86DTARKTradr 2X Long Innovation ETFScore 28
  4. Rank 88DRAMRoundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETFScore 27
  5. Rank 89DUBOTDirexion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 2X ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QLDAProShares Ultra QQQ

RAMDRoundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF

In short

QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.

RAM No data

Stated mandate

QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

RAM No data

Why people hold it

  • QLD Costs 0.89% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.96% gross), below the leveraged-bull category median and under Ultra stablemates ROM (0.93%) and DDM (0.95%).
  • Hits its stated daily 2x mark with very little drift, one of the tighter implementations among the roughly 100 leveraged bull funds in its group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, so entering and exiting rarely means hunting for the other side of the trade.
  • Trading since June 2006, which makes it one of the longest-running leveraged equity funds on the US shelf rather than a recent product-shelf experiment.

RAM No data

Worth knowing

  • QLD The 2x objective covers one day only. Hold longer and daily resets plus compounding can push results away from twice the index's move over that stretch, in either direction.proshares.com
  • Magnification runs both ways: a down day in the Nasdaq-100 lands on shareholders at roughly double size, same as an up day.
  • Cheap for geared exposure, still well above a plain unleveraged Nasdaq-100 tracker. The waiver is set to lapse September 30, 2027, after which the 0.96% gross rate applies unless renewed.

RAM No data

Full QLD profile⁠

Full RAM profile⁠

QLD vs RAM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QLD vs RAM Cost

Overpaying RAM vs QLD

$9,411

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QLD 0.89%

    $16,872

  • RAM 1.50%

    $26,283

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QLD 0.89%
  • RAM 1.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530RAM $26,283QLD $16,872

Year by year

YearQLDRAMOverpaying
10$1,576$2,590$1,014
20$5,953$9,519$3,566
30$16,872$26,283$9,411

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%QLD, cheaper
  • 1.50%RAM
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds

RAM 94th cheapest of 95 funds

QLD vs RAM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QLD 0.15%
RAM No data
Payout (12M)
QLD $0.12
RAM None
Last payment
QLD $0.03
RAM No data
Ex-dividend
QLD Sep 23, 2026
RAM No data
Paid on
QLD Sep 29, 2026
RAM No data
Frequency
QLD Quarterly
RAM No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QLDQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll QLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0012; Jun 21, 2017 $0.00044; Dec 26, 2018 $0.005; Mar 20, 2019 $0.0078; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0052; Dec 24, 2019 $0.0062; Mar 25, 2020 $0.0011; Dec 22, 2022 $0.05; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.04; Mar 20, 2024 $0.03; Jun 26, 2024 $0.05; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.01; Jun 25, 2025 $0.06; Sep 24, 2025 $0.02; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.01; Jun 24, 2026 $0.06; Sep 23, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
RAMAll RAM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QLD vs RAM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QLD 36.7%RAM No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QLD 1.04RAM No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QLD −63.7%RAM No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QLD 2.46RAM 0.00

QLD and RAM in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • QLDAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RAMDvsUYGA

    Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QLDAvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RAMDvsROMA

    Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QLDAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RAMDvsDDMB

    Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.