QLD ranks 1st and SAA 22nd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs SAA
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 1025.7×the volume
4.15M4.04K
QLD +20.4pt
+31.9%+11.5%
QLD vs SAA Performance
+97.9%+9.4%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- SAA 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- SAA $26M
- QLD +10.7%
- SAA +34.7%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- SAA 0.74%, better
- QLD 113
- SAA 603
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- SAA 4.04K sh
- QLD $82.56
- SAA $33.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | SAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A72 | A79Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B69 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and SAA are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
SAAC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
SAA Two times the daily move of the S&P SmallCap 600, the small-cap index that asks companies to earn money before it lets them in. Running since 2007, it is the quality-screened corner of leveraged small-cap trading.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 aims, before fees and expenses, to deliver daily results equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs SAA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs SAA Cost
Overpaying SAA vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
SAA 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | SAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%SAA
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
SAA 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs SAA Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- SAA 0.74%, better
- QLD $0.12
- SAA $0.25
- QLD $0.03
- SAA $0.04
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- SAA Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- SAA Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- SAA Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs SAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- SAA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%, betterSAA 38.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterSAA 0.68
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%SAA −55.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46SAA 2.06
QLD and SAA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
