QLD ranks 1st and TARK 86th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs TARK
QLD −0.59pt a year
0.89%1.48%
QLD 187.4×the volume
4.15M22.1K
QLD +10.9pt
+38.8%+27.9%
QLD vs TARK Performance
+7.6%−37.6%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- TARK 1.48%
- QLD $13.3B
- TARK $11M
- QLD +7.6%, better
- TARK −37.6%
- QLD 0.15%
- TARK 35.39%, better
- QLD 113
- TARK 2
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- TARK 22.1K sh
- QLD $82.56
- TARK $41.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | TARK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A85 |
| Risk | B66Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D28 |
| Durability | A81Higher | C49 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and TARK are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
TARKD
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
TARK Most leveraged ETFs double an index. TARK doubles a stock picker: it targets 2x the daily move of ARKK, ARK's actively managed innovation fund, in one ticker. Costs 1.48% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027, with leverage reset daily.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
TARK The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily performance of the ARK Innovation ETF. It targets this result for one trading day only.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs TARK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs TARK Cost
Overpaying TARK vs QLD
$9,127
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
TARK 1.48%
$25,999
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | TARK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $2,558 | $982 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $9,408 | $3,455 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $25,999 | $9,127 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 1.48%TARK
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
TARK 92nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs TARK Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- TARK 35.39%, better
- QLD $0.12
- TARK $14.71
- QLD $0.03
- TARK $14.71
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- TARK Dec 23, 2025
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- TARK Dec 26, 2025
- QLD Quarterly
- TARK Annual
Distribution history
QLD vs TARK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%, betterTARK 83.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterTARK 0.69
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%TARK −77.8%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46TARK 5.06
QLD and TARK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
