QLD ranks 1st and TBXU 70th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs TBXU
QLD −0.09pt a year
0.89%0.98%
QLD 1111.8×the volume
4.15M3.73K
QLD vs TBXU Performance
+10.7%+68.1%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- TBXU 0.98%
- QLD $13.3B
- TBXU $3M
- QLD +10.7%
- TBXU +68.1%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- TBXU
- QLD 113
- TBXU 11
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- TBXU 3.73K sh
- QLD $82.56
- TBXU $43.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | TBXU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | D29 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | C44 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and TBXU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
TBXUD
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
TBXU Leveraged biotech, boiled down to five names. TBXU targets 200% of the daily move in an equal-weight basket of the largest US-listed biotechs, at 0.98% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
TBXU The fund seeks daily results equal to 200% of the NYSE Biotechnology Top 5 Equal Weight Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs TBXU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs TBXU Cost
Overpaying TBXU vs QLD
$1,490
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
TBXU 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | TBXU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,729 | $153 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,504 | $551 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $18,362 | $1,490 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.98%TBXU
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
TBXU 71st cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs TBXU Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- TBXU
- QLD $0.12
- TBXU
- QLD $0.03
- TBXU $0.14
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- TBXU Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- TBXU Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- TBXU Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs TBXU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%TBXU 40.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04TBXU 1.39
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%TBXU −26.5%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46TBXU −0.18
QLD and TBXU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
