QLD ranks 1st and TEXU 71st of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs TEXU
QLD −0.09pt a year
0.89%0.98%
QLD 1079.6×the volume
4.15M3.84K
QLD vs TEXU Performance
+10.7%+114.8%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- TEXU 0.98%
- QLD $13.3B
- TEXU $3M
- QLD +10.7%
- TEXU +114.8%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- TEXU
- QLD 113
- TEXU 11
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- TEXU 3.84K sh
- QLD $82.56
- TEXU $46.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | TEXU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | D29 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | C44 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and TEXU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
TEXUD
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
TEXU Direxion's Titans line sits between a broad sector bet and a single stock: TEXU aims for 200% of the daily move of an equal-weighted index of the five largest S&P 500 energy names. It resets every day.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
TEXU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Energy (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs TEXU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs TEXU Cost
Overpaying TEXU vs QLD
$1,490
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
TEXU 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | TEXU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,729 | $153 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,504 | $551 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $18,362 | $1,490 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.98%TEXU
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
TEXU 71st cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs TEXU Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- TEXU
- QLD $0.12
- TEXU
- QLD $0.03
- TEXU $0.26
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- TEXU Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- TEXU Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- TEXU Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs TEXU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%TEXU 56.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04TEXU 1.58
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%TEXU −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46TEXU −1.43
QLD and TEXU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
