QLD ranks 1st and UBR 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UBR
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 1473.5×the volume
4.54M3.08K
QLD +40.5pt
+31.3%−9.2%
QLD vs UBR Performance
+81.1%+16.5%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UBR 0.95%
- QLD $11.5B
- UBR $2M
- QLD +13.1%, better
- UBR −9.0%
- QLD 0.16%
- UBR 2.38%, better
- QLD 114
- UBR 1
- QLD 4.54M sh, better
- UBR 3.08K sh
- QLD $74.16
- UBR $22.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UBR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B57 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UBR are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UBRC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UBR Two times the daily move of Brazil's large-cap index in one ticker, with index caps that keep Petrobras and Vale from swallowing the basket. Leverage resets every day. 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UBR UBR seeks daily results equal to two times the daily performance of the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UBR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UBR Cost
Overpaying UBR vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UBR 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UBR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UBR
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UBR 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UBR Dividends
- QLD 0.16%
- UBR 2.38%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UBR $0.56
- QLD $0.03
- UBR $0.17
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UBR Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UBR Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UBR Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UBR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UBR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%, betterUBR 50.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUBR 0.21
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%, betterUBR −65.2%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.48UBR 0.80
QLD and UBR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
