QLD ranks 1st and UBT 13th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UBT
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 50.6×the volume
4.15M81.9K
QLD +40.6pt
+31.9%−8.7%
QLD vs UBT Performance
+97.9%−69.1%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UBT 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UBT $68M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- UBT −14.5%
- QLD 0.15%
- UBT 3.27%, better
- QLD 113
- UBT 3
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UBT 81.9K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UBT $14.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A73 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UBT are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UBTB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UBT The leveraged bull aisle is wall-to-wall stock funds. UBT is the duration trade: 2x the daily move of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, and ProShares calls it the only ETF targeting that exact 2x.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UBT The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UBT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UBT Cost
Overpaying UBT vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UBT 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UBT
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UBT 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UBT Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UBT 3.27%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UBT $0.48
- QLD $0.03
- UBT $0.11
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UBT Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UBT Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UBT Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UBT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UBT 26.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUBT −0.02
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%, betterUBT −74.8%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UBT 4.79
QLD and UBT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
