QLD ranks 1st and UCC 27th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UCC
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 1559.7×the volume
4.15M2.66K
QLD +18.4pt
+31.9%+13.5%
QLD vs UCC Performance
+97.9%−12.5%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UCC 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UCC $9M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- UCC −14.9%
- QLD 0.15%
- UCC 1.38%, better
- QLD 113
- UCC 48
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UCC 2.66K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UCC $44.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UCC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UCC are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UCCC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UCC The original 2x bet on the American shopper: since 2007, UCC has aimed to deliver twice the daily move of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, spreading its leverage across a whole sector basket instead of one hot stock.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UCC UCC seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UCC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UCC Cost
Overpaying UCC vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UCC 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UCC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UCC
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UCC 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UCC Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UCC 1.38%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UCC $0.62
- QLD $0.03
- UCC $0.20
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UCC Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UCC Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UCC Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UCC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UCC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UCC 35.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUCC 0.57
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UCC −61.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UCC 2.23
QLD and UCC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
