QLD ranks 1st and UCOP 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UCOP
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 2225.3×the volume
4.15M1.86K
QLD vs UCOP Performance
−1.3%−8.1%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UCOP 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UCOP $4M
- QLD +10.7%
- UCOP
- QLD 0.15%
- UCOP
- QLD 113
- UCOP 1
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UCOP 1.86K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UCOP $39.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UCOP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95Higher | B57 |
| Risk | B66Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | C46 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UCOP are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UCOPC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UCOP Doubling down on copper, minus the Schedule K-1: UCOP targets 2x the metal's daily move inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a Form 1099. Fee is 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UCOP The fund seeks daily results equal to two times the daily performance of copper before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UCOP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UCOP Cost
Overpaying UCOP vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UCOP 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UCOP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UCOP
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UCOP 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UCOP Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UCOP
- QLD $0.12
- UCOP
- QLD $0.03
- UCOP $0.12
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UCOP Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UCOP Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UCOP Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UCOP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UCOP
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04UCOP
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UCOP
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UCOP 2.11
QLD and UCOP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
