QLD ranks 1st and UGE 12th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UGE
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 111.3×the volume
4.15M37.3K
QLD +22.2pt
+31.9%+9.7%
QLD vs UGE Performance
+97.9%−18.7%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UGE 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UGE $11M
- QLD +10.7%
- UGE +33.7%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- UGE 1.92%, better
- QLD 113
- UGE 34
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UGE 37.3K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UGE $21.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UGE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UGE are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UGEB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UGE Leverage pointed at the market's sleepiest aisle. UGE aims for twice the daily move of the S&P 500's consumer staples names, the soap-soda-and-cereal corner, and it has been doing it since 2007.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UGE The fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UGE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UGE Cost
Overpaying UGE vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UGE 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UGE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UGE
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UGE 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UGE Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UGE 1.92%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UGE $0.41
- QLD $0.03
- UGE $0.10
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UGE Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UGE Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UGE Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UGE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UGE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UGE 26.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUGE 0.55
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UGE −56.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UGE 0.80
QLD and UGE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
