QLD ranks 1st and UGL 25th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UGL
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 1.6×the volume
4.15M2.56M
QLD +17.6pt
+31.9%+14.3%
QLD vs UGL Performance
+97.9%+175.8%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UGL 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UGL $620M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- UGL −18.9%
- QLD 0.15%
- UGL
- QLD 113
- UGL 1
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UGL 2.56M sh
- QLD $82.56
- UGL $39.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | A79 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UGL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UGLC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UGL A 2x gold trade in ETF clothing: UGL targets twice the daily move of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex using futures and swaps, no bullion in a vault. It has run this playbook since 2008, a long life for a leveraged commodity fund.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UGL UGL seeks to deliver approximately twice the daily performance of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex before fees and expenses. It obtains this exposure through futures and swaps rather than direct ownership of gold.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UGL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UGL Cost
Overpaying UGL vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UGL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UGL
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UGL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UGL Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UGL
- QLD $0.12
- UGL None
- QLD $0.03
- UGL
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UGL
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UGL
- QLD Quarterly
- UGL
Distribution history
QLD vs UGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UGL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%, betterUGL 38.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUGL 0.92
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UGL −53.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UGL 0.57
QLD and UGL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
