QLD ranks 1st and UPAL 75th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UPAL
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 3821.0×the volume
4.15M1.09K
QLD vs UPAL Performance
−1.3%−46.8%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UPAL 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UPAL $0
- QLD +10.7%
- UPAL
- QLD 0.15%
- UPAL
- QLD 113
- UPAL 1
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UPAL 1.09K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UPAL $12.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UPAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95Higher | F21 |
| Risk | B66Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | D33 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UPAL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UPALD
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UPAL The first ETF built to target 2x palladium's daily move, and it sends a 1099 instead of a K-1. Swap-based, resets every day, 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UPAL UPAL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the daily performance of palladium. Its objective is designed for a single day rather than a longer holding period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UPAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UPAL Cost
Overpaying UPAL vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UPAL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UPAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UPAL
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UPAL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UPAL Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UPAL
- QLD $0.12
- UPAL
- QLD $0.03
- UPAL $0.16
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UPAL Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UPAL Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UPAL Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UPAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UPAL
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04UPAL
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UPAL
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UPAL −1.84
QLD and UPAL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
