QLD ranks 1st and UPW 20th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UPW
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 211.6×the volume
4.15M19.6K
QLD +23.3pt
+31.9%+8.6%
QLD vs UPW Performance
+97.9%+39.5%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UPW 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UPW $13M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- UPW −7.7%
- QLD 0.15%
- UPW 1.77%, better
- QLD 113
- UPW 32
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UPW 19.6K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UPW $21.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UPW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B69 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UPW are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UPWB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UPW Utilities are the market's sleepy defensive corner. UPW is the only ETF that bolts 2x daily leverage onto them, and it has been running that trade since 2007.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UPW The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the S&P Utilities Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UPW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UPW Cost
Overpaying UPW vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UPW 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UPW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UPW
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UPW 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UPW Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UPW 1.77%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UPW $0.38
- QLD $0.03
- UPW $0.13
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UPW Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UPW Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UPW Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UPW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UPW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UPW 32.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUPW 0.69
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UPW −50.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UPW 0.80
QLD and UPW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
