QLD ranks 1st and URAA 92nd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs URAA
0.0%by weight
QLD −0.41pt a year
0.89%1.30%
QLD 64.0×the volume
4.15M64.7K
QLD vs URAA Performance
+10.7%−69.9%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- URAA 1.30%
- QLD $13.3B
- URAA $25M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- URAA −69.9%
- QLD 0.15%
- URAA 21.94%, better
- QLD 113
- URAA 12
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- URAA 64.7K sh
- QLD $82.56
- URAA $15.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | URAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B56 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and URAA are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
URAAF
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
URAA A 2x daily play on uranium and nuclear built on an index of other uranium ETFs, so one ticker reaches dozens of miners and reactor names. Fee is 1.30%, net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
URAA The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the performance of the Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs URAA Holdings
How QLD and URAA differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QLD and 0.0% of URAA.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector8.0%
- Country32.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in QLDMore in URAA | QLD | URAA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | URAA +61.9 points | 0.4% | 62.3% |
| Technology | QLD +51.5 points | 52.3% | 0.8% |
| Industrials | URAA +14.7 points | 4.9% | 19.6% |
| Utilities | URAA +13.4 points | 1.0% | 14.4% |
| Financials | QLD +12.4 points | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Communication | QLD +9.6 points | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | QLD +9.2 points | 9.2% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | QLD +5.5 points | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | QLD +3.9 points | 3.9% | 0.0% |
| Materials | URAA +1.9 points | 0.9% | 2.8% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QLDMore in URAA | QLD | URAA |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | QLD +66.8 points | 97.3% | 30.5% |
| Canada | URAA +37.5 points | 1.1% | 38.6% |
| Australia | URAA +9.4 points | 0.0% | 9.4% |
| South Korea | URAA +7.4 points | 0.0% | 7.4% |
| China | URAA +4.2 points | 0.2% | 4.4% |
| United Kingdom | URAA +3.0 points | 0.2% | 3.2% |
| Finland | URAA +2.7 points | 0.0% | 2.7% |
| Japan | URAA +2.6 points | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| Other countries (4) | URAA +0.2 points | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Outside the US: URAA 81% developed, 19% emerging.
Concentration
- QLD53.3%
- URAA93.7%
- QLD112
- URAA5
Asset class
- QLD
- Equity
- URAA
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QLD112
- In both0
- Only in URAA5
Only in QLD
112 securities, 87.2% of QLD by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf10.87%
- Apple Inc5.88%
- NVIDIA Corp5.76%
- Microsoft Corp4.53%
- Micron Technology Inc3.22%
- Amazon.com Inc3.03%
- Advanced Micro Devices2.66%
- Tesla Inc2.45%
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A2.14%
- Walmart Inc1.94%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A1.92%
- Space Exploration Techn-Cl A1.86%
- Broadcom Inc1.81%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C1.80%
- Costco Wholesale Corp1.45%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.37%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.33%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-291.31%
- Intel Corp1.11%
- Applied Materials Inc1.00%
- Lam Research Corp0.96%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.96%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.89%
- Netflix Inc0.83%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.83%
- Amgen Inc0.81%
- Linde PLC0.76%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.68%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-190.67%
- Kla Corp0.67%
- Analog Devices Inc0.65%
- Shopify Inc - Class A0.61%
- Pepsico Inc0.60%
- Qualcomm Inc0.56%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.56%
- Sandisk Corp0.54%
- T-Mobile Us Inc0.54%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.49%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-030.49%
- Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.47%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.47%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.46%
- Western Digital Corp0.43%
- Starbucks Corp0.38%
- Automatic Data Processing0.38%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-010.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-240.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-260.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-110.37%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.36%
Only in URAA
5 securities, 29.7% of URAA by weight
- Global X Uranium Etf11.67%
- Vaneck Urani & Nuclr Etf-Usd7.76%
- Sprott Uranium Miners Etf3.97%
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5063.23%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut3.03%
Weight gaps
QLD and URAA share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs URAA Cost
Overpaying URAA vs QLD
$6,497
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
URAA 1.30%
$23,369
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | URAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $2,263 | $687 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $8,393 | $2,440 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $23,369 | $6,497 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 1.30%URAA
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
URAA 90th cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs URAA Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- URAA 21.94%, better
- QLD $0.12
- URAA $3.13
- QLD $0.03
- URAA $0.04
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- URAA Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- URAA Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- URAA Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs URAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%URAA 89.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04URAA 0.15
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%URAA −76.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46URAA 4.28
QLD and URAA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
