QLD ranks 1st and URE 14th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs URE
12.0%by weight
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 1486.0×the volume
4.54M3.06K
QLD +26.9pt
+31.3%+4.4%
QLD vs URE Performance
+81.1%−26.3%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- URE 0.95%
- QLD $11.5B
- URE $53M
- QLD +13.1%
- URE +16.4%, better
- QLD 0.16%
- URE 1.87%, better
- QLD 114
- URE 32
- QLD 4.54M sh, better
- URE 3.06K sh
- QLD $74.16
- URE $67.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | URE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B61 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B65 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A71 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and URE are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UREB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
URE A 2x dial on the real estate slice of the S&P 500: about 40 landlords, towers and warehouses, geared up and reset every single day. Listed January 2007, same mandate ever since.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
URE The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P Real Estate Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs URE Holdings
How QLD and URE differ
12.0%
Shared holdings make up 14.1% of URE and 12.0% of QLD.
About this figure: QLD gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
URE gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings12.0%
- Sector13.2%
- Country97.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in QLDMore in URE | Gap | QLD | URE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | URE +83.9 points | 0.0% | 83.9% | |
| Technology | QLD +48.5 points | 48.5% | 0.0% | |
| Communication | QLD +10.0 points | 10.0% | 0.0% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | QLD +9.8 points | 9.8% | 0.0% | |
| Consumer Staples | QLD +6.3 points | 6.3% | 0.0% | |
| Industrials | QLD +5.1 points | 5.1% | 0.0% | |
| Health Care | QLD +4.5 points | 4.5% | 0.0% | |
| Government | URE +2.9 points | 13.2% | 16.1% | |
| Utilities | QLD +1.0 points | 1.0% | 0.0% | |
| Materials | QLD +1.0 points | 1.0% | 0.0% | |
| Energy | QLD +0.4 points | 0.4% | 0.0% | |
| Financials | QLD +0.2 points | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QLDMore in URE | Gap | QLD | URE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | URE +2.7 points | 97.3% | 100.0% | |
| Canada | QLD +1.0 points | 1.0% | 0.0% | |
| Netherlands | QLD +0.9 points | 0.8% | 0.0% | |
| Other countries (3) | QLD +0.8 points | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- QLD51.0%
- URE65.7%
- QLD113
- URE31
Asset class
- QLD
- Stocks
- URE
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in QLD112
- In both1
- Only in URE30
Only in QLD
112 securities, 79.8% of QLD by weight
- Apple Inc6.38%
- NVIDIA Corp5.75%
- Microsoft Corp5.03%
- Amazon.com Inc3.57%
- Micron Technology Inc2.75%
- Advanced Micro Devices2.59%
- Tesla Inc2.40%
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A2.32%
- Walmart Inc2.15%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A2.14%
- Space Exploration Techn-Cl A2.03%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C2.00%
- Broadcom Inc1.79%
- Costco Wholesale Corp1.65%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-291.52%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.30%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.30%
- Intel Corp1.04%
- Applied Materials Inc0.93%
- Netflix Inc0.93%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.90%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.89%
- Lam Research Corp0.88%
- Amgen Inc0.88%
- Linde PLC0.84%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.78%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-190.78%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.73%
- Pepsico Inc0.68%
- Kla Corp0.64%
- Shopify Inc - Class A0.63%
- Analog Devices Inc0.62%
- T-Mobile Us Inc0.61%
- Qualcomm Inc0.61%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.56%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.49%
- Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.47%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.44%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-010.43%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-240.43%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-260.43%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-110.43%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-160.43%
- Sandisk Corp0.43%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.43%
- Automatic Data Processing0.42%
- Starbucks Corp0.42%
- Applovin Corp-Class A0.42%
- Marriott International -Cl A0.38%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.37%
Only in URE
30 securities, 69.8% of URE by weight
- Welltower Inc8.11%
- Prologis Inc5.54%
- Equinix Inc4.59%
- American Tower Corp4.04%
- Public Storage3.54%
- Simon Property Group Inc3.45%
- Vivmark Residential3.15%
- Ventas Inc3.07%
- Realty Income Corp3.04%
- Cbre Group Inc - A2.97%
- Crown Castle Inc2.90%
- Digital Realty Trust Inc2.85%
- Extra Space Storage Inc2.58%
- Iron Mountain Inc2.44%
- Vici Properties Inc2.10%
- Sba Communications Corp1.54%
- Essex Property Trust Inc1.34%
- Kimco Realty Corp1.31%
- Host Hotels & Resorts Inc1.30%
- Weyerhaeuser Co1.16%
- Invitation Homes Inc1.12%
- Healthpeak Properties Inc1.07%
- Mid-America Apartment Comm1.06%
- Regency Centers Corp0.96%
- Costar Group Inc0.95%
- Udr Inc0.82%
- Bxp Inc0.80%
- Camden Property Trust0.77%
- Federal Realty Invs Trust0.69%
- Alexandria Real Estate Equit0.54%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in QLDMore in URE | Gap | QLD | URE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf | URE +2.13 points | 11.96% | 14.09% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs URE Cost
Overpaying URE vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
URE 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | URE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%URE
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
URE 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs URE Dividends
- QLD 0.16%
- URE 1.87%, better
- QLD $0.12
- URE $1.31
- QLD $0.03
- URE $0.24
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- URE Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- URE Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- URE Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs URE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- URE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%URE 33.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterURE 0.49
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%URE −63.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.48URE 1.88
QLD and URE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
