QLD ranks 1st and UST 13th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UST
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 503.9×the volume
4.15M8.23K
QLD +34.3pt
+31.9%−2.4%
QLD vs UST Performance
+97.9%−32.1%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UST 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UST $16M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- UST −6.8%
- QLD 0.15%
- UST 3.49%, better
- QLD 113
- UST 2
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UST 8.23K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UST $40.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UST are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
USTB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UST While ProShares' leveraged lineup chases tech and semis, UST takes the other side: 2x the daily move of the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, built with swaps and reset every day. A rate bet, not a stock bet.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UST UST seeks daily investment results before fees and expenses that correspond to twice the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UST Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UST Cost
Overpaying UST vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UST 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UST
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UST 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UST Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UST 3.49%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UST $1.40
- QLD $0.03
- UST $0.31
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UST Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UST Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UST Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UST
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UST 13.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUST 0.03
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UST −42.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UST 2.32
QLD and UST in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
