QLD ranks 1st and UYM 16th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UYM
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 464.2×the volume
4.54M9.78K
QLD +19.6pt
+31.3%+11.7%
QLD vs UYM Performance
+81.1%+20.5%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UYM 0.95%
- QLD $11.5B
- UYM $38M
- QLD +13.1%
- UYM +44.4%, better
- QLD 0.16%
- UYM 1.06%, better
- QLD 114
- UYM 26
- QLD 4.54M sh, better
- UYM 9.78K sh
- QLD $74.16
- UYM $30.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B61 | B61 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | B65 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A71 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UYM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UYMB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UYM The only US ETF built to track 2x the daily move of the S&P materials sector: chemicals, metals, mining, packaging. Running since 2007, it resets daily, so it is a trading tool.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UYM The fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the S&P Materials Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UYM Cost
Overpaying UYM vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UYM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UYM
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UYM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UYM Dividends
- QLD 0.16%
- UYM 1.06%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UYM $0.33
- QLD $0.03
- UYM $0.09
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UYM Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UYM Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UYM Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UYM 33.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUYM 0.52
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UYM −48.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.48UYM 1.36
QLD and UYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
