QLD ranks 1st and XCOM 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs XCOM
0.0%by weight
XCOM −0.44pt a year
0.89%0.45%
QLD 11204.9×the volume
4.15M370
QLD vs XCOM Performance
−1.3%+23.8%
- QLD 0.89%
- XCOM 0.45%, better
- QLD $13.3B
- XCOM $1M
- QLD +10.7%
- XCOM
- QLD 0.15%
- XCOM
- QLD 113
- XCOM 1
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- XCOM 370 sh
- QLD $82.56
- XCOM $28.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | XCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | F23 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and XCOM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
XCOMC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
XCOM Geared commodity exposure in a category dominated by leveraged stock-index trades: XCOM aims for about two times the daily move of a commodity basket, at 0.45% a year, well under the typical leveraged-ETF fee.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
XCOM The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to approximately two times the daily performance of its commodity-related underlying exposure. The trust describes this as a single-day objective pursued through leveraged instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs XCOM Holdings
How QLD and XCOM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QLD and 0.0% of XCOM.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for XCOM.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for XCOM.
Concentration
- QLD53.3%
- XCOM199.4%
- QLD112
- XCOM0
Asset class
- QLD
- Equity
- XCOM
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in QLD112
- In both0
- Only in XCOM0
Only in QLD
112 securities, 87.2% of QLD by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf10.87%
- Apple Inc5.88%
- NVIDIA Corp5.76%
- Microsoft Corp4.53%
- Micron Technology Inc3.22%
- Amazon.com Inc3.03%
- Advanced Micro Devices2.66%
- Tesla Inc2.45%
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A2.14%
- Walmart Inc1.94%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A1.92%
- Space Exploration Techn-Cl A1.86%
- Broadcom Inc1.81%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C1.80%
- Costco Wholesale Corp1.45%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.37%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.33%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-291.31%
- Intel Corp1.11%
- Applied Materials Inc1.00%
- Lam Research Corp0.96%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.96%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.89%
- Netflix Inc0.83%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.83%
- Amgen Inc0.81%
- Linde PLC0.76%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.68%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-190.67%
- Kla Corp0.67%
- Analog Devices Inc0.65%
- Shopify Inc - Class A0.61%
- Pepsico Inc0.60%
- Qualcomm Inc0.56%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.56%
- Sandisk Corp0.54%
- T-Mobile Us Inc0.54%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.49%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-030.49%
- Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.47%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.47%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.46%
- Western Digital Corp0.43%
- Starbucks Corp0.38%
- Automatic Data Processing0.38%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-010.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-240.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-260.37%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-110.37%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.36%
Only in XCOM
0 securities, 0.0% of XCOM by weight
Weight gaps
QLD and XCOM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs XCOM Cost
Overpaying QLD vs XCOM
$7,831
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
XCOM 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | XCOM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $812 | $764 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $3,128 | $2,825 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $9,041 | $7,831 |
- 0.89%QLD
- 0.45%XCOM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
XCOM 3rd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs XCOM Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- XCOM
- QLD $0.12
- XCOM None
- QLD $0.03
- XCOM
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- XCOM
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- XCOM
- QLD Quarterly
- XCOM
Distribution history
QLD vs XCOM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%XCOM
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04XCOM
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%XCOM
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46XCOM −0.16
QLD and XCOM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
