QLV ranks 2nd and VFMV 9th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
QLV vs VFMV
QLV −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.13%
VFMV 1.7×the volume
8.88K15.2K
QLV +0.6pt
+9.8%+9.2%
QLV vs VFMV Performance
+59.7%+55.4%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- VFMV 0.13%
- QLV $193M
- VFMV $460M
- QLV +15.5%, better
- VFMV +14.8%
- QLV 1.45%
- VFMV 1.58%, better
- QLV 123
- VFMV 222
- QLV 8.88K sh
- VFMV 15.2K sh, better
- QLV $83.06
- VFMV $149.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLV | VFMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A80 |
| Mission | A76Higher | F19 |
| Risk | A85Higher | A81 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | D33 | B55Higher |
| Durability | D31 | B62Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. QLV and VFMV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLVA
VFMVB
In short
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
VFMV No index here. Vanguard's quant desk builds this one itself, running a rules-based model over large, mid and small caps to assemble the mix expected to wobble least as a portfolio, not just the calmest names one by one.
Stated mandate
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
VFMV The fund invests in a diversified portfolio of U.S. stocks intended to have lower volatility than the broad U.S. equity market, while seeking long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLV vs VFMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLV vs VFMV Cost
Overpaying VFMV vs QLV
$1,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
VFMV 0.13%
$2,726
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLV | VFMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $238 | $91 |
| 20 | $575 | $930 | $355 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $2,726 | $1,037 |
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- 0.13%VFMV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
VFMV 4th cheapest of 16 funds
QLV vs VFMV Dividends
- QLV 1.45%
- VFMV 1.58%, better
- QLV $1.18
- VFMV $2.30
- QLV $0.28
- VFMV $0.34
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- VFMV Sep 23, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- VFMV Sep 25, 2026
- QLV Quarterly
- VFMV Quarterly
Distribution history
QLV vs VFMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLV
- VFMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLV 8.6%, betterVFMV 9.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLV 1.56, betterVFMV 1.26
- Worst fall
- QLV −17.9%VFMV −15.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLV 0.58VFMV 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.