QQA ranks 2nd and ROCQ 9th of 30 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.
QQA vs ROCQ
QQA −0.06pt a year
0.29%0.35%
ROCQ 2.4×the volume
119K280K
QQA vs ROCQ Performance
+0.8%−1.3%
- QQA 0.29%, better
- ROCQ 0.35%
- QQA $894M
- ROCQ $773M
- QQA +9.6%
- ROCQ
- QQA 10.49%
- ROCQ
- QQA 123
- ROCQ 98
- QQA 119K sh
- ROCQ 280K sh, better
- QQA $53.44
- ROCQ $52.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQA | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B67 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A74Higher | B58 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
Same Category. QQA and ROCQ are both graded against the same 30 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQAA
ROCQB
In short
QQA Most Nasdaq-100 income funds write calls on the whole portfolio. QQA overlays options on roughly half, pairs covered calls with cash-secured puts, and ladders them, so a chunk of the index upside stays uncapped.
ROCQ JPMorgan's newer Nasdaq income build: a data-driven basket of Nasdaq-listed stocks paired with sold call spreads, so upside is squeezed into a band rather than capped outright. Fee: 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
QQA Actively managed QQA combines Nasdaq-100 equity exposure with an options-income overlay. It seeks consistent monthly income, long-term capital growth, and lower volatility without leverage.
ROCQ ROCQ seeks current yield alongside capital appreciation and total return by investing in NASDAQ-listed stocks and selling call option spreads. Its long-equity portfolio uses a proprietary data-science-driven allocation approach and seeks lower volatility than the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQA vs ROCQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQA vs ROCQ Cost
Overpaying ROCQ vs QQA
$1,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQA 0.29%
$5,952
ROCQ 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQA | ROCQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $634 | $107 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $2,454 | $410 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $7,126 | $1,174 |
- 0.29%QQA, cheaper
- 0.35%ROCQ
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
- Median 0.71%
QQA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
ROCQ 4th cheapest of 30 funds
QQA vs ROCQ Dividends
- QQA 10.49%
- ROCQ
- QQA $5.62
- ROCQ
- QQA $0.47
- ROCQ $0.49
- QQA Oct 19, 2026
- ROCQ Oct 1, 2026
- QQA Oct 23, 2026
- ROCQ Oct 5, 2026
- QQA Monthly
- ROCQ Monthly
Distribution history
QQA vs ROCQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQA 13.1%ROCQ
- Return per unit of risk
- QQA 0.91ROCQ
- Worst fall
- QQA −19.7%ROCQ
- Market sensitivity
- QQA 0.92ROCQ 1.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.