QQA ranks 1st and QYLD 2nd of 31 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.
QQA vs QYLD
75.4%by weight
QQA −0.27pt a year
0.33%0.60%
QYLD 37.5×the volume
118K4.44M
QQA vs QYLD Performance
+16.4%+20.1%
- QQA 0.33%, better
- QYLD 0.60%
- QQA $921M
- QYLD $8.57B
- QQA +16.4%
- QYLD +20.1%, better
- QQA 10.13%
- QYLD 11.63%, better
- QQA 120
- QYLD 103
- QQA 118K sh
- QYLD 4.44M sh, better
- QQA $56.42
- QYLD $18.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQA | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A97 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A70 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A91Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
Same Category. QQA and QYLD are both graded against the same 31 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQAA
QYLDA
In short
QQA Nasdaq-100 exposure with an options-income overlay, actively run, no leverage, paid monthly. The hook is price: 0.33% is less than half the going rate in the Nasdaq covered-call aisle.
QYLD Running since 2013, QYLD is the no-frills version of the Nasdaq-100 income trade: own the index, sell calls against it, pay out monthly. No stock picking, no manager discretion, just a rules-based buy-write index followed closely.
Stated mandate
QQA Actively managed QQA combines Nasdaq-100 equity exposure with an options-income overlay. It seeks consistent monthly income, long-term capital growth, and lower volatility without leverage.
QYLD QYLD seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the Cboe NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 Index. It uses a buy-write strategy that holds NASDAQ-100 stocks and sells corresponding call options.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQA vs QYLD Holdings
Overlap
75.4%
- 19
- 101
- 2
Holdings side by side
| Holding | QQA | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Invesco Premier US Government Money Portfolio | 19.91% | Not held |
| NVDA | 6.09% | 8.55% |
| AAPL | 5.81% | 7.80% |
| MSFT | 4.66% | 6.30% |
| MU | 3.38% | 4.83% |
| AMZN | 3.20% | 4.39% |
| AMD | 2.95% | 4.20% |
| META | 2.55% | 3.46% |
| GOOGL | 2.39% | 3.25% |
| TSLA | 2.22% | 3.11% |
Sectors
QQAQYLDSame weight
- TechnologyQQA 60.1%QYLD 60.3%
- CommunicationQQA 12.3%QYLD 12.6%
- Consumer DiscretionaryQQA 10.3%QYLD 10.1%
- Consumer StaplesQQA 5.8%QYLD 5.6%
- IndustrialsQQA 5.3%QYLD 5.1%
- Health CareQQA 3.7%QYLD 3.8%
- UtilitiesQQA 1.1%QYLD 1.0%
- EnergyQQA 0.5%QYLD 0.4%
QQA vs QYLD Cost
- 0.33%QQA, cheaper
- 0.60%QYLD
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
- Median 0.68%
QQA 2nd cheapest of 31 funds
QYLD 11th cheapest of 31 funds
$5,080
QQA vs QYLD Dividends
- QQA 10.13%
- QYLD 11.63%, better
- QQA $5.60
- QYLD $2.13
- QQA $0.49
- QYLD $0.18
- QQA Sep 21, 2026
- QYLD Sep 21, 2026
- QQA Sep 25, 2026
- QYLD Sep 24, 2026
- QQA Monthly
- QYLD Monthly
Distribution history
QQA vs QYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQA 12.5%QYLD 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQA 1.21QYLD 1.47
- Worst fall
- QQA −19.7%QYLD −24.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QQA 0.92QYLD 0.48
QQA and QYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


