QTAP ranks 2nd and QTJL 5th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.
QTAP vs QTJL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
QTJL 3.5×the volume
1.85K6.4K
QTAP +3.9pt
+12.1%+8.2%
QTAP vs QTJL Performance
+77.4%+48.1%
- QTAP 0.79%
- QTJL 0.79%
- QTAP $20M
- QTJL $26M
- QTAP +19.0%, better
- QTJL +5.2%
- QTAP 3
- QTJL 3
- QTAP 1.85K sh
- QTJL 6.4K sh, better
- QTAP $52.47
- QTJL $40.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QTAP | QTJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | C46 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A82Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | C53 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71Higher | B67 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
Same Category. QTAP and QTJL are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QTAPB
QTJLC
In short
QTAP Triple QQQ's upside to a cap, roughly one-for-one on the way down, over a one-year stretch that resets each April. Leveraged-style math without a daily reset, and no buffer underneath it.
QTJL Leverage without the buffer. QTJL aims for three times QQQ's upside over a roughly one-year outcome period, up to a cap, while declines pass through about one-for-one. It's the July-dated member of Innovator's accelerated lineup.
Stated mandate
QTAP The Fund seeks to deliver three times the positive return of the Invesco QQQ Trust over the current annual outcome period, subject to a 22.80% gross cap, while approximately matching QQQ losses. It uses FLEX Options and provides no downside buffer.
QTJL The ETF seeks to deliver three times QQQ’s upside over an approximately one-year outcome period, subject to a cap, while retaining roughly one-for-one downside exposure. It can reset for successive periods and may be held indefinitely.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QTAP vs QTJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QTAP vs QTJL Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QTAP 0.79%
$15,174
QTJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QTAP | QTJL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%QTAP
- 0.79%QTJL
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
QTAP 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QTJL 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
QTAP vs QTJL Dividends
- QTAP None
- QTJL None
Distribution history
QTAP vs QTJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QTAP
- QTJL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QTAP 8.7%, betterQTJL 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QTAP 1.72, betterQTJL 1.08
- Worst fall
- QTAP −29.4%, betterQTJL −33.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QTAP 0.55QTJL 0.79
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.