QTUM ranks 1st and THNQ 13th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
QTUM vs THNQ
QTUM −0.28pt a year
0.40%0.68%
QTUM 11.8×the volume
362K30.5K
QTUM +8.2pt
+21.5%+13.3%
QTUM vs THNQ Performance
+164.9%+86.3%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- THNQ 0.68%
- QTUM $5.06B
- THNQ $479M
- QTUM +17.5%
- THNQ +25.9%, better
- QTUM 1.05%
- THNQ
- QTUM 89
- THNQ 56
- QTUM 362K sh, better
- THNQ 30.5K sh
- QTUM $134.11
- THNQ $91.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QTUM | THNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C41 |
| Mission | A74 | A76Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A91Higher | A86 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B66 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. QTUM and THNQ are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QTUMA
THNQB
In short
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
THNQ The AI ETF that skips the mega-cap shortcut: roughly 60 global names across the AI value chain, sorted by ROBO Global's own 11-subsector classification rather than a keyword screen.
Stated mandate
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
THNQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QTUM vs THNQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QTUM vs THNQ Cost
Overpaying THNQ vs QTUM
$5,162
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
THNQ 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QTUM | THNQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,215 | $492 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $4,633 | $1,840 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $13,252 | $5,162 |
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- 0.68%THNQ
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
THNQ 17th cheapest of 30 funds
QTUM vs THNQ Dividends
- QTUM 1.05%
- THNQ
- QTUM $1.40
- THNQ
- QTUM $0.46
- THNQ $0.13
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- THNQ Dec 30, 2025
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- THNQ Dec 31, 2025
- QTUM Quarterly
- THNQ Irregular
Distribution history
QTUM vs THNQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QTUM
- THNQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QTUM 28.6%THNQ 28.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QTUM 1.30, betterTHNQ 1.13
- Worst fall
- QTUM −38.4%, betterTHNQ −50.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QTUM 1.67THNQ 1.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


