Skip to content

QVML vs VONV

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF

QVMLANYSE Arca

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.05pt a year

QVML0.11%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 14.1×the volume

QVML54.8KVONV774K

5Y return · a year

QVML +0.6pt

QVML+12.3%VONV+11.7%

QVML vs VONV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+78.4%QVML+73.8%VONV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QVML +78.4%. VONV +73.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QVML 0.11%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
QVML $1.7B
VONV $23.3B
1Y total return
QVML +13.3%
VONV +28.5%, better
Yield (12M)
QVML 1.00%
VONV 1.53%, better
Holdings
QVML 438
VONV 873
Avg volume (30D)
QVML 54.8K sh
VONV 774K sh, better
NAV per share
QVML $44.93
VONV $113.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QVML: Cost 91, Risk 59, Mission 91, Tradability 47, Holdings 31, Durability 61. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 86, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 49, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for QVML, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQVMLVONV
Cost30% weightA91A96Higher
Mission25% weightA91A100Higher
Risk15% weightB59A86Higher
Tradability15% weightC47B60Higher
Holdings10% weightD31C49Higher
Durability5% weightB61A93Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QVML and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and QVML 17th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 16AFSMDFidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 17AQVMLInvesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETFScore 72
  5. Rank 18AFLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETFScore 71

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QVMLAInvesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

QVML Most multifactor funds tear the S&P 500 down and rebuild it. QVML just shaves off the bottom: it holds roughly 400 of the names, screened for quality, value and momentum, and charges 0.11% to do it.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

QVML The fund seeks exposure to a subset of S&P 500 securities selected for quality, value, and momentum characteristics through the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • QVML 0.11% expense ratio, a fraction of what the typical multifactor large-cap fund charges.
  • The "Top 90%" index drops the weakest slice rather than rebuilding the market from scratch, leaving roughly 400 large caps on familiar S&P 500 ground.invesco.com
  • Three tilts in one ticker: quality, value and momentum, applied inside a single S&P 500 universe. No separate factor sleeves to juggle.invesco.com
  • An Invesco fund running since 2021, now in the multi-billion-dollar range, with quarterly distributions.
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • QVML Thinly traded next to the household-name index funds. Spreads are worth a look, and limit orders do more work here.
  • Cutting only the bottom tenth keeps the portfolio close to the parent index. The factor tilt is deliberately mild, not a sharp break from the S&P 500.
  • Plain single-style peers go cheaper (VYM at 0.04%, VONV at 0.06%), so the fee buys the multi-factor screen, not the beta.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full QVML profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

QVML vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QVML vs VONV Cost

Overpaying QVML vs VONV

$1,043

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QVML 0.11%

    $2,313

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QVML 0.11%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K$2.5K051015202530QVML $2,313VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearQVMLVONVOverpaying
10$201$110$91
20$788$432$356
30$2,313$1,270$1,043

Expense ratio

  • 0.11%QVML
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

QVML 9th cheapest of 99 funds

QVML vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QVML 1.00%
VONV 1.53%, better
Payout (12M)
QVML $0.45
VONV $1.74
Last payment
QVML $0.11
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
QVML Sep 21, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
QVML Sep 25, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
QVML Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QVMLQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll QVML payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2021 $0.07; Dec 20, 2021 $0.10; Mar 21, 2022 $0.09; Jun 21, 2022 $0.10; Sep 19, 2022 $0.10; Dec 19, 2022 $0.10; Mar 20, 2023 $0.10; Jun 20, 2023 $0.10; Sep 18, 2023 $0.09; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10; Mar 18, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.09; Sep 23, 2024 $0.10; Dec 23, 2024 $0.11; Mar 24, 2025 $0.11; Jun 23, 2025 $0.10; Sep 22, 2025 $0.11; Dec 22, 2025 $0.11; Mar 23, 2026 $0.11; Jun 22, 2026 $0.11; Sep 21, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

QVML vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QVML
  • VONV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QVML −23.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QVML 12.0%, betterVONV 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QVML 1.48, betterVONV 1.43
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QVML −23.5%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QVML 0.89VONV 0.85

QVML and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QVMLAvsILCVA

    Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QVMLAvsVYMA

    Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QVMLAvsIMCVA

    Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.