RYLD ranks 1st and RDTY 9th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
RDTY vs RYLD
RYLD −1.13pt a year
1.73%0.60%
RYLD 42.1×the volume
12K504K
RDTY vs RYLD Performance
+14.1%+12.1%
- RDTY 1.73%
- RYLD 0.60%, better
- RDTY $15M
- RYLD $1.3B
- RDTY +14.1%, better
- RYLD +12.1%
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- RYLD 12.18%
- RDTY 4
- RYLD 6
- RDTY 12K sh
- RYLD 504K sh, better
- RDTY $33.74
- RYLD $15.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RDTY | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A97Higher |
| Risk | D35 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | |
| Durability | D25 | A86Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. RDTY and RYLD are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RDTYD
RYLDA
In short
RDTY YieldMax's small-cap income experiment: sell options that expire the same day against Russell 2000 exposure, then push the premium out on a weekly schedule. A fast-cycle twist on the classic covered-call fund, priced like a specialty product.
RYLD The veteran of small-cap options income. Launched in 2019 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it owns the Russell 2000 and sells calls against it, swapping some upside for a monthly check.
Stated mandate
RDTY Actively managed to generate current income through frequent option-premium capture while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index's price return; it targets weekly income distributions.
RYLD The Fund is designed to track the price and yield performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RDTY vs RYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RDTY vs RYLD Cost
Overpaying RDTY vs RYLD
$17,625
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RDTY 1.73%
$29,442
RYLD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RDTY | RYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,959 | $1,076 | $1,883 |
| 20 | $10,765 | $4,116 | $6,649 |
| 30 | $29,442 | $11,817 | $17,625 |
- 1.73%RDTY
- 0.60%RYLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLD 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RDTY 9th cheapest of 9 funds
RDTY vs RYLD Dividends
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- RYLD 12.18%
- RDTY $14.82
- RYLD $1.87
- RDTY $0.24
- RYLD $0.15
- RDTY Oct 28, 2026
- RYLD Oct 19, 2026
- RDTY Oct 29, 2026
- RYLD Oct 22, 2026
- RDTY Weekly
- RYLD Monthly
Distribution history
RDTY vs RYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RDTY 14.2%RYLD 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RDTY 1.03RYLD 0.73
- Worst fall
- RDTY −17.3%RYLD −21.4%
- Market sensitivity
- RDTY 0.90RYLD 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 1.73% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.