RYLG ranks 2nd and RDTY 9th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
RDTY vs RYLG
RYLG −1.38pt a year
1.73%0.35%
RDTY 6.6×the volume
12K1.82K
RDTY vs RYLG Performance
+14.1%+12.7%
- RDTY 1.73%
- RYLG 0.35%, better
- RDTY $15M
- RYLG $7M
- RDTY +14.1%, better
- RYLG +12.7%
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- RDTY 4
- RYLG 2
- RDTY 12K sh, better
- RYLG 1.82K sh
- RDTY $33.74
- RYLG $23.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RDTY | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A99Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | D35Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | |
| Durability | D25 | C45Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. RDTY and RYLG are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RDTYD
RYLGA
In short
RDTY YieldMax's small-cap income experiment: sell options that expire the same day against Russell 2000 exposure, then push the premium out on a weekly schedule. A fast-cycle twist on the classic covered-call fund, priced like a specialty product.
RYLG Most small-cap income funds sell calls on the whole book. RYLG writes one-month at-the-money calls on about half of it, leaving the rest uncapped, and it charges the lowest fee in its Russell 2000 options-income group.
Stated mandate
RDTY Actively managed to generate current income through frequent option-premium capture while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index's price return; it targets weekly income distributions.
RYLG The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It obtains Russell 2000 equity exposure and sells one-month at-the-money calls covering approximately half of the portfolio value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RDTY vs RYLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RDTY vs RYLG Cost
Overpaying RDTY vs RYLG
$22,316
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RDTY 1.73%
$29,442
RYLG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RDTY | RYLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,959 | $634 | $2,325 |
| 20 | $10,765 | $2,454 | $8,311 |
| 30 | $29,442 | $7,126 | $22,316 |
- 1.73%RDTY
- 0.35%RYLG, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLG cheapest of 9 funds
RDTY 9th cheapest of 9 funds
RDTY vs RYLG Dividends
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- RDTY $14.82
- RYLG $2.42
- RDTY $0.24
- RYLG $0.11
- RDTY Oct 28, 2026
- RYLG Oct 19, 2026
- RDTY Oct 29, 2026
- RYLG Oct 22, 2026
- RDTY Weekly
- RYLG Monthly
Distribution history
RDTY vs RYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RDTY 14.2%RYLG 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- RDTY 1.03RYLG 0.83
- Worst fall
- RDTY −17.3%RYLG −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- RDTY 0.90RYLG 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 1.73% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.