FTKI ranks 4th and RDTY 9th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
FTKI vs RDTY
FTKI −0.87pt a year
0.86%1.73%
RDTY 1.8×the volume
6.66K12K
FTKI vs RDTY Performance
+19.9%+14.1%
- FTKI 0.86%, better
- RDTY 1.73%
- FTKI $25M
- RDTY $15M
- FTKI +19.9%, better
- RDTY +14.1%
- FTKI 11.81%
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- FTKI 199
- RDTY 4
- FTKI 6.66K sh
- RDTY 12K sh, better
- FTKI $19.56
- RDTY $33.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTKI | RDTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A70 |
| Risk | A82Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | A75 | |
| Durability | C45Higher | D25 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. FTKI and RDTY are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTKIB
RDTYD
In short
FTKI Most Russell 2000 income funds own the index and sell calls on it. FTKI runs an actively picked basket of roughly 300 US small caps, then writes index-level calls over the top: income first, appreciation second, paid monthly.
RDTY YieldMax's small-cap income experiment: sell options that expire the same day against Russell 2000 exposure, then push the premium out on a weekly schedule. A fast-cycle twist on the classic covered-call fund, priced like a specialty product.
Stated mandate
FTKI The Fund seeks current income first and capital appreciation second. It primarily invests in small-cap equities listed on U.S. exchanges and writes exchange-traded calls on the Russell 2000 Index or small-cap equity ETFs.
RDTY Actively managed to generate current income through frequent option-premium capture while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index's price return; it targets weekly income distributions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTKI vs RDTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTKI vs RDTY Cost
Overpaying RDTY vs FTKI
$13,074
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTKI 0.86%
$16,368
RDTY 1.73%
$29,442
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTKI | RDTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $2,959 | $1,434 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $10,765 | $4,997 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $29,442 | $13,074 |
- 0.86%FTKI, cheaper
- 1.73%RDTY
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
FTKI 6th cheapest of 9 funds
RDTY 9th cheapest of 9 funds
FTKI vs RDTY Dividends
- FTKI 11.81%
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- FTKI $2.31
- RDTY $14.82
- FTKI $0.19
- RDTY $0.24
- FTKI Oct 21, 2026
- RDTY Oct 28, 2026
- FTKI Oct 30, 2026
- RDTY Oct 29, 2026
- FTKI Monthly
- RDTY Weekly
Distribution history
FTKI vs RDTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTKI 10.8%RDTY 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTKI 0.61RDTY 1.03
- Worst fall
- FTKI −15.2%RDTY −17.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FTKI 0.27RDTY 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.