IWMW ranks 2nd and RDTY 9th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMW vs RDTY
IWMW −1.34pt a year
0.39%1.73%
IWMW 1.2×the volume
14.8K12K
IWMW vs RDTY Performance
+9.7%+14.1%
- IWMW 0.39%, better
- RDTY 1.73%
- IWMW $55M
- RDTY $15M
- IWMW +9.7%
- RDTY +14.1%, better
- IWMW 20.14%
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- IWMW 1970
- RDTY 4
- IWMW 14.8K sh, better
- RDTY 12K sh
- IWMW $37.45
- RDTY $33.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMW | RDTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A70 |
| Risk | D39Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C51Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | B64Higher | D25 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMW and RDTY are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMWA
RDTYD
In short
IWMW Small-cap income, stripped down: IWMW owns a Russell 2000 index fund and writes monthly covered calls against it, at 0.39% a year when most Russell 2000 call-writers charge more.
RDTY YieldMax's small-cap income experiment: sell options that expire the same day against Russell 2000 exposure, then push the premium out on a weekly schedule. A fast-cycle twist on the classic covered-call fund, priced like a specialty product.
Stated mandate
IWMW The fund seeks to track an index holding the iShares Russell 2000 ETF and writes monthly covered calls to generate income.
RDTY Actively managed to generate current income through frequent option-premium capture while providing exposure to the Russell 2000 Index's price return; it targets weekly income distributions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMW vs RDTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMW vs RDTY Cost
Overpaying RDTY vs IWMW
$21,544
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMW 0.39%
$7,898
RDTY 1.73%
$29,442
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMW | RDTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $2,959 | $2,254 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $10,765 | $8,040 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $29,442 | $21,544 |
- 0.39%IWMW, cheaper
- 1.73%RDTY
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
IWMW 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
RDTY 9th cheapest of 9 funds
IWMW vs RDTY Dividends
- IWMW 20.14%
- RDTY 43.86%, better
- IWMW $7.52
- RDTY $14.82
- IWMW $0.59
- RDTY $0.24
- IWMW Oct 2, 2026
- RDTY Oct 28, 2026
- IWMW Oct 7, 2026
- RDTY Oct 29, 2026
- IWMW Monthly
- RDTY Weekly
Distribution history
IWMW vs RDTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMW 12.4%RDTY 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMW 0.37RDTY 1.03
- Worst fall
- IWMW −21.9%RDTY −17.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMW 0.75RDTY 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.73% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.