Skip to content

RDVI vs TCAL

FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF

RDVIACboe

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF

TCALANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TCAL −0.41pt a year

RDVI0.75%TCAL0.34%

Avg volume · 30D

RDVI 14.7×the volume

RDVI1.17MTCAL79.7K

RDVI vs TCAL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.8%RDVI+9.2%TCAL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. RDVI +18.8%. TCAL +9.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%25%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RDVI 0.75%
TCAL 0.34%, better
Fund size
RDVI $3.82B
TCAL $319M
1Y total return
RDVI +18.8%, better
TCAL +9.2%
Yield (12M)
RDVI 8.29%
TCAL 11.73%, better
Holdings
RDVI 73
TCAL 106
Avg volume (30D)
RDVI 1.17M sh, better
TCAL 79.7K sh
NAV per share
RDVI $28.01
TCAL $23.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RDVI: Cost 72, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 94, Holdings 86, Durability 96. TCAL: Cost 97, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 87, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for RDVI, TCAL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRDVITCAL
Cost30% weightA72A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56B64Higher
Tradability15% weightA94HigherB58
Holdings10% weightA86A87Higher
Durability5% weightA96HigherA84

Rank among Active Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RDVI and TCAL are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Active Option Income⁠

Category · 50 funds
See all 50 ›

TCAL ranks 2nd and RDVI 4th of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ARECIColumbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETScore 83
  2. Rank 2ATCALT. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 2AYLDEFranklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETFScore 80
  4. Rank 4APAYRFederated Hermes Enhanced Income ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 4ARDVIFT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETFScore 76
  6. Rank 6AACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETFScore 74

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RDVIAFT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF

TCALAT. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF

In short

RDVI Two engines in one wrapper: roughly 50 rising-dividend stocks on the equity side, and calls sold on the S&P 500 (not on those stocks) for the income, targeting 8 points above the index's dividend yield, paid monthly.

TCAL An active stock picker's take on the covered-call trade: roughly 70 hand-chosen holdings, calls written on top, cash paid out monthly, all for 0.34% a year.

Stated mandate

RDVI The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation. It primarily invests in U.S.-traded equities in the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index and sells U.S.-traded calls on the S&P 500 Index or ETFs tracking it.

TCAL The fund seeks regular distributions while aiming to preserve capital and potentially achieve capital appreciation. It invests in equities and writes covered calls to generate cash flow alongside dividends.

Why people hold it

  • RDVI The income target is written into the mandate: annualized distributions aimed at 8 percentage points above the S&P 500's dividend yield, paid monthly.
  • Calls are written on the S&P 500, not on the fund's own holdings, so no individual dividend grower in the portfolio gets called away when it runs.ftportfolios.com
  • A concentrated equity sleeve of about 50 US dividend growers, not a 500-name index clone wearing an options overlay.
  • Billion-dollar-plus asset base and active daily trading, which puts it among the easier funds to move in and out of in this crowded category.
  • TCAL At 0.34% a year, it undercuts most active options-income funds, including DIVO at 0.56%, so more of the option premium stays in the portfolio instead of the fee line.
  • Active all the way down: roughly 70 equities picked by T. Rowe Price, with covered calls layered on to generate cash alongside dividends. No index sitting underneath.
  • Pays monthly, and the stated mandate ties those distributions to preserving capital and seeking appreciation rather than maximizing headline yield.
  • Ranks among the strongest implementations in a crowded options-income field, with cost the clearest edge.

Worth knowing

  • RDVI At 0.75%, it runs above the typical S&P 500 income fund, and cheaper overlays exist in the same lane (IVVW at 0.25%, GPIX at 0.35%).
  • The prospectus discloses distributions can include return of capital, so part of a monthly payment may be your own money coming back.
  • Stocks and options sit on different benchmarks. When the S&P 500 outruns the dividend-grower sleeve, the short calls give back more than the holdings pick up.
  • TCAL Written calls trade upside for cash. When the stock picks run hard, the calls limit how much of that move the fund keeps.
  • Launched in 2025, so there is no full market-cycle record to judge the strategy against yet.
  • The fund discloses that distributions can include return of capital, meaning part of a payout may be your own money coming back rather than income earned.

Full RDVI profile⁠

Full TCAL profile⁠

RDVI vs TCAL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RDVI vs TCAL Cost

Overpaying RDVI vs TCAL

$7,550

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RDVI 0.75%

    $14,482

  • TCAL 0.34%

    $6,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RDVI 0.75%
  • TCAL 0.34%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RDVI $14,482TCAL $6,932

Year by year

YearRDVITCALOverpaying
10$1,336$616$720
20$5,078$2,386$2,692
30$14,482$6,932$7,550

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%RDVI
  • 0.34%TCAL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Active Option Income funds
  • Median 0.95%

TCAL 2nd cheapest of 50 funds

RDVI 14th cheapest of 50 funds

RDVI vs TCAL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RDVI 8.29%
TCAL 11.73%, better
Payout (12M)
RDVI $2.32
TCAL $2.71
Last payment
RDVI $0.20
TCAL $0.26
Ex-dividend
RDVI Oct 21, 2026
TCAL Oct 30, 2026
Paid on
RDVI Oct 30, 2026
TCAL Pays Nov 3, 2026
Frequency
RDVI Monthly
TCAL Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

RDVIMonthly · 46 paymentsAll RDVI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 24, 2023 $0.16; Feb 22, 2023 $0.17; Mar 24, 2023 $0.16; Apr 21, 2023 $0.17; May 23, 2023 $0.16; Jun 27, 2023 $0.16; Jul 21, 2023 $0.17; Aug 22, 2023 $0.16; Sep 22, 2023 $0.16; Oct 24, 2023 $0.15; Nov 21, 2023 $0.16; Dec 22, 2023 $0.17; Jan 23, 2024 $0.16; Feb 21, 2024 $0.17; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Apr 23, 2024 $0.17; May 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Jul 23, 2024 $0.18; Aug 21, 2024 $0.17; Sep 26, 2024 $0.18; Oct 22, 2024 $0.18; Nov 21, 2024 $0.18; Dec 13, 2024 $0.18; Jan 22, 2025 $0.18; Feb 21, 2025 $0.18; Mar 27, 2025 $0.17; Apr 22, 2025 $0.16; May 21, 2025 $0.18; Jun 26, 2025 $0.17; Jul 22, 2025 $0.18; Aug 21, 2025 $0.18; Sep 25, 2025 $0.18; Oct 21, 2025 $0.18; Nov 21, 2025 $0.18; Dec 12, 2025 $0.18; Jan 21, 2026 $0.19; Feb 20, 2026 $0.19; Mar 26, 2026 $0.18; Apr 21, 2026 $0.19; May 21, 2026 $0.19; Jun 25, 2026 $0.20; Jul 21, 2026 $0.20; Aug 21, 2026 $0.21; Sep 24, 2026 $0.20; Oct 21, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
TCALMonthly · 20 paymentsAll TCAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Apr 25, 2025 $0.17; May 27, 2025 $0.24; Jun 25, 2025 $0.22; Jul 28, 2025 $0.20; Aug 26, 2025 $0.20; Sep 25, 2025 $0.20; Oct 28, 2025 $0.30; Nov 24, 2025 $0.21; Dec 23, 2025 $0.22; Jan 27, 2026 $0.26; Feb 24, 2026 $0.18; Mar 26, 2026 $0.22; Apr 27, 2026 $0.21; May 26, 2026 $0.19; Jun 25, 2026 $0.18; Jun 30, 2026 $0.18; Jul 31, 2026 $0.25; Aug 31, 2026 $0.17; Sep 30, 2026 $0.18; Oct 30, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

RDVI vs TCAL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RDVI 14.1%TCAL 9.4%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RDVI 1.15TCAL 0.24since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RDVI −18.3%since Oct 2022TCAL −7.2%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RDVI 0.87TCAL 0.20

RDVI and TCAL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RDVIAvsRECIA

    FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF · Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ET

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TCALAvsRECIA

    T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF · Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ET

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RDVIAvsYLDEA

    FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF · Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.48%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TCALAvsYLDEA

    T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF · Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.48%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RDVIAvsPAYRA

    FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF · Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TCALAvsPAYRA

    T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF · Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.