TQQQ ranks 1st and RETL 12th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
RETL vs TQQQ
TQQQ −0.18pt a year
0.96%0.78%
TQQQ 170.1×the volume
336K57.2M
TQQQ +41.4pt
−2.2%+39.2%
RETL vs TQQQ Performance
−78.9%+50.5%
- RETL 0.96%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- RETL $32M
- TQQQ $33.2B
- RETL +32.2%, better
- TQQQ +12.9%
- RETL 0.72%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- RETL 81
- TQQQ 115
- RETL 336K sh
- TQQQ 57.2M sh, better
- RETL $8.77
- TQQQ $62.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RETL | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | D36 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C40 | A79Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. RETL and TQQQ are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RETLC
TQQQA
In short
RETL Retail, tripled. RETL aims for 300% of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index's daily move, spread across roughly 80 retailers instead of one or two giants. Trading since 2010, and the math resets every day.
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
RETL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index.
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RETL vs TQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RETL vs TQQQ Cost
Overpaying RETL vs TQQQ
$3,032
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RETL 0.96%
$18,034
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RETL | TQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,388 | $307 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $5,268 | $1,115 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $15,002 | $3,032 |
- 0.96%RETL
- 0.78%TQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
RETL 11th cheapest of 30 funds
RETL vs TQQQ Dividends
- RETL 0.72%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- RETL $0.07
- TQQQ $0.48
- RETL $0.02
- TQQQ $0.16
- RETL Sep 22, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- RETL Sep 29, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- RETL Quarterly
- TQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
RETL vs TQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RETL
- TQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RETL 62.5%TQQQ 56.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RETL 0.53TQQQ 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- RETL −92.0%TQQQ −81.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RETL 3.49TQQQ 3.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.87%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.