TSLS ranks 3rd and RGTZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
RGTZ vs TSLS
TSLS −0.88pt a year
1.83%0.95%
RGTZ 1.7×the volume
680K410K
RGTZ vs TSLS Performance
−54.0%+1.0%
- RGTZ 1.83%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- RGTZ $14M
- TSLS $39M
- RGTZ −54.0%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- RGTZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- RGTZ 3
- TSLS 4
- RGTZ 680K sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- RGTZ $25.61
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RGTZ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A87Higher |
| Risk | C43 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C53 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. RGTZ and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RGTZC
TSLSA
In short
RGTZ The first ETF built to short Rigetti two-for-one. RGTZ aims for -200% of the quantum computing stock's move each trading day, with the clock reset at every close, and charges 1.83%.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
RGTZ The fund seeks daily inverse results of negative two times the daily percentage change in Rigetti Computing, Inc.’s share price. It is intended for short-term tactical use and does not target results beyond one trading day.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RGTZ vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RGTZ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying RGTZ vs TSLS
$12,885
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RGTZ 1.83%
$30,754
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RGTZ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,117 | $1,678 | $1,439 |
| 20 | $11,291 | $6,322 | $4,969 |
| 30 | $30,754 | $17,869 | $12,885 |
- 1.83%RGTZ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
RGTZ 40th cheapest of 43 funds
RGTZ vs TSLS Dividends
- RGTZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- RGTZ None
- TSLS $1.57
- RGTZ
- TSLS $0.40
- RGTZ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- RGTZ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- RGTZ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
RGTZ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RGTZ 180.0%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RGTZ 0.49TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- RGTZ −92.9%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RGTZ −7.29TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.83% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.83% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.83% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.