XLII ranks 2nd and RNTY 14th of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
RNTY vs XLII
XLII −0.64pt a year
0.99%0.35%
XLII 6.1×the volume
2.6K15.9K
RNTY vs XLII Performance
+7.6%+9.0%
- RNTY 0.99%
- XLII 0.35%, better
- RNTY $5M
- XLII $17M
- RNTY +7.6%
- XLII +9.0%, better
- RNTY 12.55%
- XLII 13.46%, better
- RNTY 51
- XLII 3
- RNTY 2.6K sh
- XLII 15.9K sh, better
- RNTY $47.47
- XLII $24.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RNTY | XLII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D29 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C51 |
| Durability | C50 | C51Higher |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. RNTY and XLII are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RNTYC
XLIIA
In short
RNTY Most YieldMax funds chase the biggest yield they can wring from a single stock. RNTY inverts that: it owns 15 to 30 US real estate companies outright and sells calls on them to aim at a 12% annual distribution level, paid monthly.
XLII Covered calls swarm tech; far rarer on machinery, railroads and defense primes. XLII owns the 1998-vintage industrials SPDR and sells short-dated calls on that fund itself, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
RNTY The Fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of U.S.-listed real estate-company securities and related options. Its strategy targets 12% annual income through monthly distributions, although the target is not guaranteed.
XLII The fund is actively managed to pursue current income while retaining the potential for long-term capital growth. It invests in XLI and sells call options on XLI to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RNTY vs XLII Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RNTY vs XLII Cost
Overpaying RNTY vs XLII
$11,399
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RNTY 0.99%
$18,525
XLII 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RNTY | XLII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $634 | $1,112 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $2,454 | $4,111 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $7,126 | $11,399 |
- 0.99%RNTY
- 0.35%XLII, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLII cheapest of 22 funds
RNTY 17th cheapest of 22 funds
RNTY vs XLII Dividends
- RNTY 12.55%
- XLII 13.46%, better
- RNTY $5.96
- XLII $3.23
- RNTY $0.46
- XLII $0.30
- RNTY Oct 7, 2026
- XLII Oct 1, 2026
- RNTY Oct 8, 2026
- XLII Oct 5, 2026
- RNTY Monthly
- XLII Monthly
Distribution history
RNTY vs XLII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RNTY 10.8%XLII 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- RNTY 0.19XLII 0.60
- Worst fall
- RNTY −7.9%XLII −10.1%
- Market sensitivity
- RNTY 0.40XLII 0.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.