XLVI ranks 2nd and RNTY 14th of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
RNTY vs XLVI
XLVI −0.64pt a year
0.99%0.35%
XLVI 16.8×the volume
2.6K43.7K
RNTY vs XLVI Performance
+7.6%+20.2%
- RNTY 0.99%
- XLVI 0.35%, better
- RNTY $5M
- XLVI $36M
- RNTY +7.6%
- XLVI +20.2%, better
- RNTY 12.55%, better
- XLVI 11.95%
- RNTY 51
- XLVI 2
- RNTY 2.6K sh
- XLVI 43.7K sh, better
- RNTY $47.47
- XLVI $27.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RNTY | XLVI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | B62 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C43 |
| Durability | C50 | B63Higher |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. RNTY and XLVI are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RNTYC
XLVIA
In short
RNTY Most YieldMax funds chase the biggest yield they can wring from a single stock. RNTY inverts that: it owns 15 to 30 US real estate companies outright and sells calls on them to aim at a 12% annual distribution level, paid monthly.
XLVI Covered calls, pointed at one sector. XLVI owns State Street's health care sector ETF outright, then sells call options on that single fund, turning pharma, device and biotech exposure into a monthly income stream.
Stated mandate
RNTY The Fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of U.S.-listed real estate-company securities and related options. Its strategy targets 12% annual income through monthly distributions, although the target is not guaranteed.
XLVI State Street describes an actively managed strategy seeking current income while preserving prospects for long-term capital growth. It invests in the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF and sells call options on that ETF to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RNTY vs XLVI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RNTY vs XLVI Cost
Overpaying RNTY vs XLVI
$11,399
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RNTY 0.99%
$18,525
XLVI 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RNTY | XLVI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $634 | $1,112 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $2,454 | $4,111 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $7,126 | $11,399 |
- 0.99%RNTY
- 0.35%XLVI, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLVI cheapest of 22 funds
RNTY 17th cheapest of 22 funds
RNTY vs XLVI Dividends
- RNTY 12.55%, better
- XLVI 11.95%
- RNTY $5.96
- XLVI $3.29
- RNTY $0.46
- XLVI $0.31
- RNTY Oct 7, 2026
- XLVI Oct 1, 2026
- RNTY Oct 8, 2026
- XLVI Oct 5, 2026
- RNTY Monthly
- XLVI Monthly
Distribution history
RNTY vs XLVI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RNTY 10.8%XLVI 10.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- RNTY 0.19XLVI 1.91
- Worst fall
- RNTY −7.9%XLVI −8.1%
- Market sensitivity
- RNTY 0.40XLVI 0.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.