WAMA ranks 1st and ROMO 15th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
ROMO vs WAMA
WAMA −0.59pt a year
0.92%0.33%
WAMA 5.5×the volume
2.23K12.4K
ROMO vs WAMA Performance
−1.4%+1.3%
- ROMO 0.92%
- WAMA 0.33%, better
- ROMO $25M
- WAMA $199M
- ROMO +6.0%
- WAMA
- ROMO 8.42%
- WAMA
- ROMO 6
- WAMA 507
- ROMO 2.23K sh
- WAMA 12.4K sh, better
- ROMO $34.02
- WAMA $26.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROMO | WAMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | B69Higher |
| Durability | F24 | B62Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. ROMO and WAMA are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMOD
WAMAA
In short
ROMO Most trend funds flip one switch on one moving average. ROMO's index lets a crowd of simple momentum and trend models vote, then shifts weekly in small steps, rotating among US, developed and emerging market equity ETFs or Treasuries as the votes change.
Stated mandate
ROMO The Fund seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns corresponding to the Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index. It uses passive indexing to track that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROMO vs WAMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROMO vs WAMA Cost
Overpaying ROMO vs WAMA
$10,636
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROMO 0.92%
$17,373
WAMA 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROMO | WAMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,627 | $598 | $1,029 |
| 20 | $6,138 | $2,318 | $3,820 |
| 30 | $17,373 | $6,737 | $10,636 |
- 0.92%ROMO
- 0.33%WAMA, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
WAMA cheapest of 20 funds
ROMO 17th cheapest of 20 funds
ROMO vs WAMA Dividends
- ROMO 8.42%
- WAMA
- ROMO $2.82
- WAMA
- ROMO $2.82
- WAMA $0.05
- ROMO Dec 29, 2025
- WAMA Sep 25, 2026
- ROMO Dec 30, 2025
- WAMA Sep 29, 2026
- ROMO Annual
- WAMA Quarterly
Distribution history
ROMO vs WAMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROMO 10.4%WAMA
- Return per unit of risk
- ROMO 0.99WAMA
- Worst fall
- ROMO −20.3%WAMA
- Market sensitivity
- ROMO 1.04WAMA 0.59
ROMO and WAMA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.92% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
