Skip to content

RVER vs TACU

Trenchless Fund ETF

RVERDNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

TACUANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TACU −0.66pt a year

RVER0.66%TACU0.00%

Avg volume · 30D

RVER 2.1×the volume

RVER8.54KTACU4.15K

RVER vs TACU Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.3%RVER+11.2%TACU

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. RVER +7.3%. TACU +11.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RVER 0.66%
TACU 0.00%, better
Fund size
RVER $128M
TACU $17M
1Y total return
RVER +2.1%
TACU No data
Holdings
RVER 16
TACU 411
Avg volume (30D)
RVER 8.54K sh, better
TACU 4.15K sh
NAV per share
RVER $33.16
TACU $27.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RVER: Cost 52, Risk 11, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 38, Durability 43. TACU: Cost 99, Risk 69, Mission 81, Tradability 49, Holdings 83, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for RVER, TACU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRVERTACU
Cost30% weightC52A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightF11B69Higher
Tradability15% weightC40C49Higher
Holdings10% weightD38A83Higher
Durability5% weightC43C43

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RVER and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

TACU ranks 9th and RVER 84th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 8AAPUEActivePassive U.S. Equity ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 9ATACUT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 10APQUSPictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 84DFLCEFrontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 39
  5. Rank 84DRVERTrenchless Fund ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 86DCBSEClough Select Equity ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RVERDTrenchless Fund ETF

TACUAT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

In short

RVER A 12-to-30 stock picker in an ETF wrapper: River1 hunts U.S. listed names it rates as having an above-average chance of outperforming the S&P 500, and charges 0.66% to do it. Non-diversified, so individual holdings carry real weight.

TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

RVER The Fund seeks capital appreciation. The available current prospectus evidence does not establish a sufficiently specific underlying, geography, sector, factor screen, or strategy descriptor for a supplied cohort.

TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.

Why people hold it

  • RVER Genuinely active, not closet indexing. The book typically runs 12 to 30 stocks, so each pick actually moves the fund rather than getting buried in an index.stockanalysis.comsec.gov
  • The mandate is wide open: any U.S. listed equity qualifies, including preferred shares, ADRs and REITs, at any market cap.sec.gov
  • Growth at a reasonable price is the stated discipline, and management lays out its reasoning in plain language in the annual shareholder report.sec.gov
  • At 0.66% with no waiver propping it up, the fee sits near the typical active U.S. equity ETF. The sticker price is the real price.
  • TACU Fee fully waived: 0.14% gross, zero net through January 30, 2027. That sits below every top-scoring peer in the category, including DFAU at 0.12% with no waiver.troweprice.com
  • Quant models feed bottom-up stock picking with tilts to profitability, quality and value, chasing excess return over the Russell 1000 while holding tracking error tight.troweprice.com
  • Several hundred large-cap names, so no single position runs the show. One of the stronger profiles in a crowded active U.S. equity field.troweprice.com

Worth knowing

  • RVER Concentration cuts both ways. Non-diversified status lets a handful of names dominate the portfolio, so one stumble shows up quickly in the price.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and order size matters more.
  • You are paying 0.66% for human discretion, not a rulebook. Category leaders built on systematic models, such as DFAU at 0.12%, cost far less.
  • TACU Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and the risk read rests on limited history.
  • Still a small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider spreads than the category's giants.
  • Distributions are annual at most, with no declared income target. This is a growth mandate, not a cash-flow one.

Full RVER profile⁠

Full TACU profile⁠

RVER vs TACU Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RVER vs TACU Cost

Overpaying RVER vs TACU

$12,896

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RVER 0.66%

    $12,896

  • TACU 0.00%

    $0

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RVER 0.66%
  • TACU 0.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RVER $12,896TACU $0

Year by year

YearRVERTACUOverpaying
10$1,180$0$1,180
20$4,504$0$4,504
30$12,896$0$12,896

Expense ratio

  • 0.66%RVER
  • 0.00%TACU, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

TACU cheapest of 121 funds

RVER 60th cheapest of 121 funds

RVER vs TACU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
RVER No data
TACU None
Last payment
RVER $0.53
TACU No data
Ex-dividend
RVER Dec 17, 2025
TACU No data
Paid on
RVER Dec 18, 2025
TACU No data
Frequency
RVER Irregular
TACU No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

RVERIrregular · 1 paymentAll RVER payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2025 $0.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
TACUAll TACU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RVER vs TACU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RVER 21.7%since May 2024TACU No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RVER 0.53since May 2024TACU No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RVER −26.2%since Apr 2024TACU No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RVER 1.47TACU 0.96

RVER and TACU in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RVERDvsAVLCA

    Trenchless Fund ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsAVLCA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RVERDvsDFAUA

    Trenchless Fund ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsDFAUA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RVERDvsDFACA

    Trenchless Fund ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsDFACA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.