RWM ranks 4th and SARK 15th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SARK
RWM −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
RWM 211.4×the volume
30M142K
RWM +21.6pt
−14.4%−36.0%
RWM vs SARK Performance
−10.2%−3.4%
- RWM 0.95%, better
- SARK 0.99%
- RWM $163M
- SARK $36M
- RWM −10.2%
- SARK −3.4%, better
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SARK 3.29%
- RWM 3
- SARK 2
- RWM 30M sh, better
- SARK 142K sh
- RWM $14.37
- SARK $25.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SARK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | D39 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SARK are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SARKC
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SARK The original anti-ARKK trade. Launched in 2021 as the first US ETF built to short another ETF, SARK uses swaps to aim for the inverse of the ARK Innovation ETF's move over a single day, then resets overnight. A trading tool, not a hold.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SARK The Fund seeks daily inverse exposure to the ARK Innovation ETF for one trading day, using swaps and daily repositioning. It is intended for sophisticated, actively managed trading or hedging strategies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SARK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SARK Cost
Overpaying SARK vs RWM
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SARK 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SARK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%RWM, cheaper
- 0.99%SARK
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SARK 49th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SARK Dividends
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SARK 3.29%
- RWM $0.48
- SARK $0.85
- RWM $0.09
- SARK $0.85
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SARK Dec 23, 2025
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SARK Dec 26, 2025
- RWM Quarterly
- SARK Annual
Distribution history
RWM vs SARK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterSARK 46.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99SARK −0.79, better
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%SARK −83.5%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23SARK −2.73
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.