RWM ranks 4th and TWM 17th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs TWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 40.8×the volume
30M736K
RWM +15.4pt
−11.1%−26.5%
RWM vs TWM Performance
−18.3%−55.8%
- RWM 0.95%
- TWM 0.95%
- RWM $163M
- TWM $56M
- RWM −10.2%, better
- TWM −23.8%
- RWM 3.32%
- TWM 3.87%, better
- RWM 3
- TWM 1
- RWM 30M sh, better
- TWM 736K sh
- RWM $14.37
- TWM $23.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | B63 | B63 |
| Durability | B69Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and TWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
TWMC
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
TWM The double-strength small-cap bear trade, running since 2007: TWM aims for two times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and resets every day. Built for short holds, by design.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
TWM The Fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance. It is not designed to achieve that inverse target over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs TWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs TWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
TWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%TWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs TWM Dividends
- RWM 3.32%
- TWM 3.87%, better
- RWM $0.48
- TWM $0.93
- RWM $0.09
- TWM $0.18
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- TWM Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- TWM Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- TWM Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs TWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- TWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterTWM 36.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99, betterTWM −1.01
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%, betterTWM −77.4%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23TWM −2.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.