UYG ranks 2nd and RXL 11th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
RXL vs UYG
UYG −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.93%
UYG 1.2×the volume
14.5K17.3K
RXL +0.9pt
+17.9%+17.0%
RXL vs UYG Performance
+40.9%+56.5%
- RXL 0.95%
- UYG 0.93%, better
- RXL $113M
- UYG $777M
- RXL +56.4%, better
- UYG +11.5%
- RXL 0.90%
- UYG 11.13%, better
- RXL 62
- UYG 83
- RXL 14.5K sh
- UYG 17.3K sh, better
- RXL $70.10
- UYG $93.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RXL | UYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B69 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | A75 | A80Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RXL and UYG are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RXLB
UYGA
In short
RXL Health care with the volume turned up: RXL targets two times the daily move of the S&P Health Care Select Sector Index. It has been running that one-day dial since 2007, through a long run of drug-pricing and policy cycles.
UYG Listed in January 2007, a year before the banking crash, UYG targets 2x the daily move of the financial stocks in the S&P 500. A veteran of the leveraged shelf, priced at 0.93% with no fee waiver propping that number up.
Stated mandate
RXL The fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the S&P Health Care Select Sector Index.
UYG UYG seeks pre-expense daily results equal to 2x the daily performance of the S&P Financial Select Sector Index. It is designed to provide magnified financials-sector exposure on a daily basis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RXL vs UYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RXL vs UYG Cost
Overpaying RXL vs UYG
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RXL 0.95%
$17,869
UYG 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RXL | UYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,644 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,199 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,539 | $330 |
- 0.95%RXL
- 0.93%UYG, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
UYG 29th cheapest of 95 funds
RXL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
RXL vs UYG Dividends
- RXL 0.90%
- UYG 11.13%, better
- RXL $0.63
- UYG $10.38
- RXL $0.13
- UYG $0.09
- RXL Sep 23, 2026
- UYG Sep 23, 2026
- RXL Sep 29, 2026
- UYG Sep 29, 2026
- RXL Quarterly
- UYG Quarterly
Distribution history
RXL vs UYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RXL
- UYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RXL 29.6%, betterUYG 30.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- RXL 0.72UYG 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- RXL −36.1%, betterUYG −47.8%
- Market sensitivity
- RXL 1.14UYG 1.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.