QLD ranks 1st and RXL 11th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs RXL
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 286.7×the volume
4.15M14.5K
QLD +14.0pt
+31.9%+17.9%
QLD vs RXL Performance
+97.9%+40.9%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- RXL 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- RXL $113M
- QLD +10.7%
- RXL +56.4%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- RXL 0.90%, better
- QLD 113
- RXL 62
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- RXL 14.5K sh
- QLD $82.56
- RXL $70.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | RXL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A75 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and RXL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
RXLB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
RXL Health care with the volume turned up: RXL targets two times the daily move of the S&P Health Care Select Sector Index. It has been running that one-day dial since 2007, through a long run of drug-pricing and policy cycles.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
RXL The fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the S&P Health Care Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs RXL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs RXL Cost
Overpaying RXL vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
RXL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | RXL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%RXL
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
RXL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs RXL Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- RXL 0.90%, better
- QLD $0.12
- RXL $0.63
- QLD $0.03
- RXL $0.13
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- RXL Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- RXL Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- RXL Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs RXL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- RXL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%RXL 29.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterRXL 0.72
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%RXL −36.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46RXL 1.14
QLD and RXL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
