SCHZ ranks 2nd and UITB 27th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCHZ vs UITB
SCHZ −0.22pt a year
0.03%0.25%
SCHZ 11.6×the volume
2.37M204K
UITB +0.5pt
−0.2%+0.3%
SCHZ vs UITB Performance
−1.0%+1.5%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- UITB 0.25%
- SCHZ $10.8B
- UITB $2.66B
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- UITB −0.3%
- SCHZ 4.27%
- UITB 4.39%, better
- SCHZ 12610
- UITB 1247
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- UITB 204K sh
- SCHZ $22.54
- UITB $45.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHZ | UITB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A76 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A88Higher | A75 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCHZ and UITB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHZA
UITBB
In short
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
UITB Most core bond ETFs clone the Agg index for three basis points. This one is run by people: an active take on the intermediate investment-grade market, launched in 2017 under the USAA banner and flying Victory Capital's flag since 2019.
Stated mandate
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
UITB The Fund seeks high current income while limiting undue risk to principal. It invests mainly in debt securities and related instruments, with duration generally near that of the Bloomberg 1-3 Year Credit Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHZ vs UITB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHZ vs UITB Cost
Overpaying UITB vs SCHZ
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
UITB 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHZ | UITB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $455 | $400 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,769 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $638 | $5,159 | $4,521 |
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- 0.25%UITB
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
UITB 39th cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ vs UITB Dividends
- SCHZ 4.27%
- UITB 4.39%, better
- SCHZ $0.96
- UITB $2.00
- SCHZ $0.08
- UITB $0.19
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- UITB Oct 8, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- UITB Oct 9, 2026
- SCHZ Monthly
- UITB Monthly
Distribution history
SCHZ vs UITB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHZ
- UITB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHZ 5.6%UITB 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHZ 0.17UITB 0.21, better
- Worst fall
- SCHZ −17.5%UITB −16.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SCHZ 0.99UITB 0.96
SCHZ and UITB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
