SCHZ ranks 2nd and WABF 76th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCHZ vs WABF
SCHZ −0.32pt a year
0.03%0.35%
SCHZ 673.4×the volume
2.37M3.52K
WABF +0.7pt
+5.4%+6.1%
SCHZ vs WABF Performance
−0.2%−0.9%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- WABF 0.35%
- SCHZ $10.8B
- WABF $12M
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- WABF −0.9%
- SCHZ 4.27%
- WABF 5.54%, better
- SCHZ 12610
- WABF 391
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- WABF 3.52K sh
- SCHZ $22.54
- WABF $24.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHZ | WABF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C47Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A88Higher | C42 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCHZ and WABF are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHZA
WABFC
In short
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
WABF Western Asset has run bond money since 1971, and WABF is that core-plus playbook in ETF form: an actively picked book of roughly 400 US bonds, paid out monthly, with room to reach into high yield.
Stated mandate
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
WABF The Fund seeks to maximize total return while maintaining prudent investment management and meeting liquidity needs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHZ vs WABF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHZ vs WABF Cost
Overpaying WABF vs SCHZ
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
WABF 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHZ | WABF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $634 | $579 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,454 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $638 | $7,126 | $6,488 |
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- 0.35%WABF
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
WABF 60th cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ vs WABF Dividends
- SCHZ 4.27%
- WABF 5.54%, better
- SCHZ $0.96
- WABF $1.33
- SCHZ $0.08
- WABF $0.13
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- WABF Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- WABF Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Monthly
- WABF Monthly
Distribution history
SCHZ vs WABF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHZ 5.6%, betterWABF 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHZ 0.17WABF 0.25, better
- Worst fall
- SCHZ −17.5%WABF −5.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHZ 0.99WABF 0.30
SCHZ and WABF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
